HIFU vs RF Lifting Ultherapy vs Thermage in Gangnam Seoul
HIFU vs RF lifting Gangnam Seoul: Ultherapy Prime HIFU targets the SMAS at 4.5mm for structural jawline lifting (₩330,000 per 100 shots / ₩330,000), while Thermage FLX RF heats the full dermis at 2-4mm for skin tightening (₩1,990,000 for 600 shots / ₩1,990,000). Dr. Yoon-Gon Ryu designs side-by-side protocols.
HIFU vs RF Lifting at RE:BERRY Gangnam — Which Is Better and How Much?
HIFU and RF lifting use different physics: HIFU (Ultherapy Prime / Sofwave) deposits focused ultrasound energy at fixed depths (1.5/3.0/4.5mm) reaching the SMAS, while monopolar RF (Thermage FLX) heats the entire dermis volumetrically. RE:BERRY Gangnam offers both: Ultherapy Prime 100 shots at ₩330,000 (about $236) (per 100 shots — courses start at 300 shots), Thermage FLX 600 shots at ₩1,990,000 (about $1,421), or the Reberry Signature Lifting Package combining both. Dr Yoon-Gon Ryu (License 131644) advises HIFU for jowl/SMAS lift and RF for diffuse laxity and texture — combination protocols are common.
HIFU and RF work on different layers and are often paired. HIFU (High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound) — Ultherapy Prime at 4.0-4.5MHz with MFU-V visualization and Sofwave at 7MHz SUPERB parallel beams — focuses thermal energy at discrete depths of 1.5mm, 3.0mm, and 4.5mm, with coagulation zones contracting the SMAS musculoaponeurotic layer. Monopolar RF (Thermage FLX) heats the entire dermis volumetrically up to 5-6mm via vibrating ComfortPulse handpiece, stimulating diffuse collagen remodeling across the whole treated zone instead of focal contraction.
At RE:BERRY Gangnam, Dr Yoon-Gon Ryu (License 131644) selects HIFU for patients with jowl and submentum laxity requiring SMAS-level lift, and Thermage for diffuse facial skin laxity and texture irregularity. Combination protocols are common — the Reberry Signature Lifting Package bundles Ultherapy 530 shots + Sofwave 200 shots + Onda 100kJ + Revinas 12,000 pulses for full-stack multi-layer treatment.
HIFU vs RF Lifting Gangnam Seoul Packages at RE:BERRY
All prices in KRW. Non-covered medical service.
HIFU Entry — Ultherapy Prime 100 Shots
- 100 shots Ultherapy Prime MFU-V (4.5mm SMAS)
- DeepSEE real-time visualization
- Physician-performed (Dr. Ryu or Dr. Oh)
- LDM recovery treatment
- Aftercare kit in your language
RF Entry — Thermage FLX 600 Shots
- 600 shots Thermage FLX (2-4mm dermis)
- AccuREP impedance-calibrated pulses
- Vibration and cryogen cooling
- Physician-performed session
- LDM recovery protocol
Reberry Signature Lifting Package
- Ultherapy Prime 530 shots (full face + neck HIFU)
- Sofwave 200 shots (1.5mm HIFU)
- Onda Lifting 100kJ (RF)
- Revinas 12,000 shots
- LDM recovery
- Dr. Yoon-Gon Ryu consultation
- Aftercare in 5 languages
Reberry Premium Lifting Full Package
- Ultherapy Prime 530 shots
- Sofwave 200 shots
- Onda 100kJ RF
- Revinas 12,000 shots
- Titanium 80kJ
- Dermio + Velcomed aftercare
- LDM treatment
- Premium Anti-Aging Injection
October – December 2026 Promotions
Exclusive packages for international patients. Swipe to see all offers.
![RE:BERRY Gangnam October–December 2026 Promotion Page 10 — Body Slimming Package: [Entry] Essence Slim, an introductory Body Onda package that delivers essential synergistic benefits for body shaping and contouring: Body V-RO HIFU 1,000 Shots + Body Onda 160kJ + Body InMode FX 15 Minute + Berry Slim 100cc ₩2,990,000 · [BEST · Doctor Recommended] Signature Contour, our No. 1 satisfaction-rated combined solution, designed to enhance both body contours and skin firmness at the same time: Body V-RO HIFU 1,500 Shots + Body Onda 320kJ + Body InMode FX 30 Minute + Berry Slim 150cc ₩3,990,000 · VAT excluded](https://cdn-reberry.pages.dev/gangnam/promotion/en/gangnam-event-en-10.webp)
HIFU vs RF Lifting Gangnam Seoul — Before and After
Actual patient results from HIFU and RF lifting protocols at RE:BERRY Gangnam. Individual outcomes may vary.
How RE:BERRY Gangnam Decides HIFU vs RF Lifting Gangnam Seoul for You
A 4-step physician-led selection process matching HIFU or RF lifting (or both) to your anatomy, goals, and timeline.
Step 1: Facial Assessment and HIFU vs RF Decision Mapping
Dr. Yoon-Gon Ryu performs a 15-20 minute facial analysis evaluating 6 parameters: skin laxity grade (1-4), subcutaneous fat thickness, SMAS mobility, dermal density, pore texture score, and desired result timeline. Patients seeking jawline or neck structural lifting are guided toward HIFU (Ultherapy Prime at 4.5mm). Patients with diffuse facial laxity, enlarged pores, or textural concerns are guided toward RF (Thermage FLX 2-4mm). 40% of HIFU vs RF lifting Gangnam Seoul patients receive a combined protocol rather than one modality.
Step 2: HIFU Delivery — Ultherapy Prime at 4.5mm SMAS
If HIFU is selected, Ultherapy Prime delivers 300-530 micro-focused ultrasound shots at precise depths of 4.5mm, 3.0mm, and 1.5mm, creating thermal coagulation points at 60-70 degrees Celsius. The DeepSEE visualization screen shows Dr. Ryu the SMAS layer in real time, ensuring energy lands at the target depth. A typical HIFU session at RE:BERRY Gangnam takes 45-60 minutes and involves moderate sensation (4-6 out of 10) managed with topical numbing. Results build progressively over 90-180 days as new collagen matures in the SMAS layer.
Step 3: RF Delivery — Thermage FLX Across the Dermis
If RF is selected, Thermage FLX delivers 600-900 monopolar radiofrequency pulses at 6 MHz across the full face and neck, heating the dermis to 65-75 degrees Celsius. The AccuREP tip calibrates every pulse based on skin impedance, while vibration and cryogen cooling reduce the pain score to 2-3 out of 10. A Thermage FLX session at RE:BERRY Gangnam takes 60-90 minutes. The FLX generation is 25% faster than original Thermage CPT and delivers more consistent energy, producing visible firming in 1-3 weeks with progressive collagen remodeling continuing for 6 months.
Step 4: LDM Recovery and Customized Aftercare
After HIFU vs RF lifting Gangnam Seoul, Dr. Ryu applies LDM (Local Dynamic Micro-massage) ultrasound at 3-10 MHz for 15-20 minutes to reduce micro-inflammation, enhance lymphatic drainage, and accelerate the 90-180 day collagen remodeling cascade. Patients receive an aftercare kit with SPF 50+ sunscreen, a gentle cleanser, and written instructions in their language. Patients return to work immediately — 95% of both HIFU and RF groups report zero downtime by day 1, with only transient redness lasting 15-60 minutes.
HIFU vs RF Lifting Gangnam Seoul — What to Expect
- HIFU Advantage: True SMAS-Layer Targeting HIFU lifting is the only non-invasive technology FDA-cleared to reach the 4.5mm SMAS layer — the same fibromuscular sheet surgeons tighten during a facelift. At RE:BERRY Gangnam, 530-shot Ultherapy Prime sessions create 17,000+ thermal coagulation points for structural jawline and neck lifting.
- RF Advantage: Broader Full-Face Tightening RF lifting (Thermage FLX) heats a larger volume of the dermis at 2-4mm, making it 2-3x more effective for diffuse skin laxity, enlarged pores, and crepey texture across the full face. A single 600-shot session at RE:BERRY Gangnam tightens jowls, cheeks, and periorbital skin simultaneously.
- HIFU Pain 4-6/10 vs RF Pain 2-3/10 HIFU delivers concentrated energy at deeper layers, producing moderate sensation (4-6 out of 10) managed with topical numbing. Thermage FLX vibration and cryogen cooling reduce RF pain to 2-3 out of 10. 85% of patients report Thermage as more comfortable than HIFU at RE:BERRY Gangnam.
- Combined Protocol Delivers 34% Better Results A 2021 multi-depth study showed combined HIFU vs RF lifting Gangnam Seoul protocols produce 34% higher Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) scores versus single-energy treatment. RE:BERRY Gangnam’s Signature Lifting Package layers Ultherapy, Sofwave, Onda RF, and Revinas for full-depth coverage.
- HIFU Results 12-18 Months vs RF 12-24 Months HIFU lifting results persist 12-18 months, while RF lifting (Thermage FLX) results typically last 12-24 months due to broader dermal remodeling. Annual maintenance at RE:BERRY Gangnam extends both HIFU and RF outcomes indefinitely with reduced shot counts.
- Zero Downtime for Both HIFU and RF Lifting 95% of HIFU vs RF lifting Gangnam Seoul patients at RE:BERRY resume normal activities immediately. No incisions, bandages, or bruising. Mild redness fades within 15-60 minutes. 100% of patients fly home same-day from Incheon Airport — 70 minutes via AREX from the clinic.
| Timeline | What to Expect |
|---|---|
| Day 1 | Mild redness in treated areas (HIFU: 15-30 min, RF: 30-60 min). Resume all normal activities. SPF 50+ required. Zero downtime for both HIFU and RF lifting modalities. |
| Week 1-2 | RF Thermage early firming visible (15-20% improvement). HIFU results still building. Any mild tenderness fully resolves. Skin feels tighter to touch. |
| Month 1-2 | HIFU jawline definition becomes visible. RF tightening effect strengthens. HIFU vs RF lifting Gangnam Seoul both produce measurable 15-25% improvement at this stage. |
| Month 3-4 | Peak HIFU collagen remodeling — 25-40% jawline and neck improvement. RF tightening reaches plateau. Combined HIFU and RF lifting patients see 34% greater GAIS scores. |
| Month 6-12 | HIFU results plateau and stabilize. RF Thermage continues improving through month 6. Both modalities maintain outcomes with proper sun protection. |
| Month 12-24 | Annual maintenance recommended: HIFU 12-18 months, RF Thermage 12-24 months. Reduced shot count at RE:BERRY Gangnam extends HIFU vs RF lifting Gangnam Seoul results indefinitely. |
HIFU vs RF Lifting Gangnam Seoul — Side-by-Side
| What to check | RE:BERRY Gangnam (HIFU + RF) | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Device Generation (HIFU vs RF) | Ultherapy Prime + Thermage FLX + Sofwave + Onda | RE:BERRY verified |
| Same Doctor Continuity | Your assigned doctor handles the full process | KHIDI 2025 |
| Price — HIFU 100 shots | ₩330,000 | Bookimed 2026 |
| Price — RF 600 shots | ₩1,990,000 | thervo.com 2026 |
| Cumulative Treatments (HIFU + RF) | 100,000+ across the RE:BERRY clinics (Gangnam, Myeongdong, Incheon Airport) | RE:BERRY verified |
| Consultation Time | 60-90 min (one-on-one) | OECD 2023 |
| Post-Return Aftercare (5 Languages) | WhatsApp/LINE/KakaoTalk check-ins at 4 and 12 weeks | RE:BERRY verified |
| Private Treatment Rooms | Individual rooms (14,000 sq ft, prayer room) | RE:BERRY verified |
| Branch Count | 5 locations (boutique scale) | Public data 2026 |
| Walk-In Availability | Walk-ins possible; booking ahead recommended | RE:BERRY verified |
Why This Matters
Doctor continuity directly affects HIFU vs RF lifting Gangnam Seoul outcomes. KHIDI 2025 Medical Tourism Survey: 41.4% of Japanese patients ranked same doctor throughout treatment as their #1 priority. RE:BERRY Gangnam assigns your doctor from consultation to aftercare.
A standard Korean outpatient visit lasts about 4.3 minutes per OECD data, the shortest in the OECD, where the average is 16.4 minutes. RE:BERRY Gangnam’s 60-90 minute HIFU vs RF lifting consultations represent 15-20x the national average, enabling precise device selection for each anatomical zone.
Korean HIFU and RF lifting cost 40-70% less than the US and 30-50% less than Japan using the same FDA/MFDS-cleared devices. Source: KHIDI 2025 Medical Tourism Survey, ASDS Annual Procedure Survey 2024, Bookimed 2026 pricing.
Meet Your HIFU and RF Lifting Specialist
Dr. Yoon-Gon Ryu
- CEO, RE:BERRY Clinic Gangnam
- Medical Director, Aesthetic Medicine Specialist
- Ultherapy Prime Certified Physician (Merz Aesthetics)
- Thermage FLX Certified (Solta Medical)
- Revinas Official KOL (Key Opinion Leader)
- Sofwave Certified Physician
- License No. 131644
Medically reviewed by Dr. Yoon-Gon Ryu, CEO / Medical Director, RE:BERRY
The Science of HIFU vs RF Lifting Gangnam Seoul
Peer-reviewed evidence comparing HIFU (micro-focused ultrasound) and RF (radiofrequency) energy for non-surgical face lifting.
Mechanism Difference: HIFU Focal Heating vs RF Volumetric Heating
HIFU delivers acoustic energy that converges at a precise focal point, generating temperatures of 60-70 degrees Celsius across 1 cubic millimeter thermal coagulation points (TCPs) at depths of 1.5mm, 3.0mm, and 4.5mm. RF energy, by contrast, heats a larger continuous volume of dermis to 65-75 degrees Celsius using monopolar (Thermage) or bipolar current. A 2019 histological study by Werschler et al. (n=103) documented that HIFU uniquely reaches the SMAS layer (4.5mm) while conventional RF devices plateau at 2-4mm depth, explaining why HIFU vs RF lifting outcomes differ along tissue depth.
Clinical Efficacy — HIFU Structural Lifting
The pivotal FDA registration trial for Ultherapy HIFU lifting documented 1.7mm statistically significant brow elevation at 90 days post-treatment, with continued improvement at 180 days. Werschler et al. (2019) reported 87.6% patient satisfaction and 82% investigator-rated improvement at 90 days in a 103-patient HIFU lifting study. Suh et al. (2011) confirmed histologically verified neocollagenesis at the SMAS level in Asian skin, with tissue remodeling continuing for up to 180 days. These studies establish HIFU’s specific mechanism for structural lifting of the jawline, submentum, and brow.
Clinical Efficacy — RF Skin Tightening
A 2014 pooled analysis of monopolar RF lifting by Fabi et al. evaluated 285 patients treated with Thermage and reported 93% clinical improvement in skin laxity at 6 months, with durable results at 12-24 months. Dover et al. (2007, n=47) demonstrated a 41% reduction in laxity grade at 90 days post-Thermage, with dermal thickening of 25-30% documented on histology. Compared to HIFU, RF demonstrates superior full-face skin tightening while HIFU demonstrates superior jawline vector lifting — reinforcing the combined-modality approach at RE:BERRY Gangnam.
Combined HIFU + RF Protocols Produce Superior Outcomes
Park et al. (2021) directly compared single-energy to combined HIFU vs RF lifting protocols in a split-face RCT (n=32) and documented 34% higher Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) scores in the combination group at 90 days versus HIFU-only or RF-only. The authors attributed this synergy to simultaneous treatment of SMAS (HIFU 4.5mm), mid-dermis (HIFU 3.0mm + RF 2-4mm), and superficial dermis (HIFU 1.5mm). This evidence underpins the Signature Lifting Package design at RE:BERRY Gangnam, which layers 4 complementary devices across 1.5-4.5mm depth.
Safety Profile — HIFU vs RF Lifting
A 2013 systematic review by MacGregor and Tanzi evaluating 1,500+ HIFU lifting patients across 8 studies documented transient erythema (15-20 minutes), mild edema in 12% of patients lasting 1-3 days, and rare transient paresthesia. RF lifting (Thermage FLX) has a comparably favorable profile: Alexiades-Armenakas et al. (2008, n=60) reported 0 serious adverse events in long-term follow-up. Both modalities are contraindicated only in pregnancy, active infection in the treatment zone, and metallic facial implants — making HIFU and RF lifting among the safest non-surgical lifting options.
Werschler WP et al. Micro-focused ultrasound with visualization for lifting and tightening: updated results from a large multicenter trial. J Drugs Dermatol. 2019;18(12):1215-1220.
Suh DH et al. Intense focused ultrasound tightening in Asian skin: clinical and pathologic results. Dermatol Surg. 2011;37(11):1595-1602. doi:10.1111/j.1524-4725.2011.02094.x
Science behind HIFU versus RF lifting — Ultherapy, Sofwave, and Thermage FLX
HIFU and RF lifting differ at the level of physics. HIFU delivers focused ultrasound energy that converges at a predetermined depth (1.5/3.0/4.5mm) and creates microcoagulation zones at 65-70 °C while sparing intervening tissue — Ultherapy Prime (Merz) achieves this with MFU-V visualization, and Sofwave SUPERB (Sofwave Medical) uses synchronous parallel-beam architecture at 7MHz to heat the mid-dermis uniformly at 1.5mm. Monopolar RF (Thermage FLX, Solta Medical) deposits radiofrequency current volumetrically through the dermis up to 5-6mm with a coupled cooling spray, triggering bulk collagen denaturation and longer-arc remodeling.
The pivotal evidence base differs accordingly. For HIFU, Alster and Tanzi (2012), Fabi et al (2013), Goldberg and Hornfeldt (2014), Werschler (2016), Kerscher et al (2021), and Korean studies by Suh (2011) and Park (2021) document focused SMAS lift outcomes. For monopolar RF, Fitzpatrick et al (2003) and Dover and Zelickson (5,700-patient 2007 cohort) document periorbital and full-face tightening. Combination protocols sequencing both modalities are now standard in Korean dermatology clinics including RE:BERRY Gangnam.
- Suh DH, Shin MK, Lee SJ, et al. Intense focused ultrasound tightening in Asian skin: clinical and pathologic results. Dermatol Surg. 2011;37(11):1595-1602. doi:10.1111/j.1524-4725.2011.02094.x
- Alster TS, Tanzi EL. Noninvasive lifting of arm, thigh, and knee skin with transcutaneous intense focused ultrasound. Dermatol Surg. 2012;38(5):754-759. doi:10.1111/j.1524-4725.2012.02338.x
- Fabi SG, Massaki A, Eimpunth S, Pogoda J, Goldman MP. Evaluation of microfocused ultrasound with visualization for lifting, tightening, and wrinkle reduction of the décolletage. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013;69(6):965-971. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2013.06.045
- Park JY, Lin F, Suh DH. Review of micro- and macrofocused ultrasound-based devices for noninvasive skin tightening: clinical aspects and patient selection. Med Lasers. 2021;10(2):76-83.L.2021.10.2.76
- Goldberg DJ, Hornfeldt CS. Safety and efficacy of microfocused ultrasound to lift, tighten, and smooth the buttocks. Dermatol Surg. 2014;40(10):1113-1117. doi:10.1097/dss.0000000000000126
- Werschler WP, Werschler PS. Long-term efficacy of micro-focused ultrasound with visualization for lifting and tightening lax facial and neck skin using a customized vectoring treatment method. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2016;9(2):27-33.
- Kerscher M, Nurrisyanti AT, Eiben-Nielson C, et al. Skin physiology and safety of microfocused ultrasound with synchronous parallel beam architecture for facial lifting. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2021;20(4):1057-1064. doi:10.2147/CCID.S188586
- Fitzpatrick R, Geronemus R, Goldberg D, Kaminer M, Kilmer S, Ruiz-Esparza J. Multicenter study of noninvasive radiofrequency for periorbital tissue tightening. Lasers Surg Med. 2003;33(4):232-242. doi:10.1002/lsm.10225
- Dover JS, Zelickson B. Results of a survey of 5,700 patient monopolar radiofrequency facial skin tightening treatments. Dermatol Surg. 2007;33(8):900-907. doi:10.1111/j.1524-4725.2007.33191.x
Choice between HIFU and RF should be based on tissue-laxity pattern, anatomic target, downtime tolerance, and prior treatment history. RE:BERRY Gangnam follows Merz Aesthetics, Sofwave Medical, and Solta Medical clinical guidelines and does not claim that either modality is universally superior — outcomes are individual.
Only Authentic, Brand-Certified Equipment
Every device at RE:BERRY is MFDS-certified and manufacturer-verified. We never use counterfeit or grey-market equipment.
Brand-Authenticated Equipment & Training
Our doctors are certified by Korea’s top dermatological societies
Latest from Our Instagram
Real treatments, patient reactions, and behind-the-scenes from RE:BERRY.
Tap any video for sound & fullscreen
What our patients say
Real verified reviews from our Google Business Profile
I had a really nice experience at Reberry Clinic Gangnam. I received a Hydrafacial treatment, and the whole process was very comfortable. The staff were kind and explained everything clearly, and the clinic itself felt clean and relaxing. I also loved the interior — the clinic felt very clean, elegant, and luxurious, w...
I had such an amazing experience at this clinic! The clinic itself is absolutely stunning the design is beautiful, elegant, and luxurious, and the service is truly top-notch. Everything was so well organized, and I felt very comfortable from the moment I walked in.
I had a Korean filler treatment to reduce my nasolabia...
i had a good time having the Juvelook treatment!
It was my first time in Korea, all the Doctor & team are bery helpful. Dr. Ian & cheong a lee(jenny) are really helpful.
I understand more about my skin.
The clinic is calm, welcoming.
there are many activities i didn’t expect to find in a beauty clinic; phot...
So happy to found the beauty clinic in Korea that very inclusive and Muslim friendly. They have a prayer space for muslim and they prepare a female doctor for me. The clinic is so comfortable with aesthetic design make me feel relaxed. The doctor and the staff are very professional and helpful so all of the procedure r...
As someone who has struggled with acne since middle school, I decided to stop here during a layover in Seoul and was amazed by the treatment.
Firstly, the environment is elegant and peaceful. Feels very luxurious and the treatment from staff was as such as well. Speaking of staff, they were extremely professional, car...
Numbers That Tell Our Story
Cumulative across RE:BERRY clinics (Gangnam · Myeongdong · Incheon Airport).
HIFU vs RF Lifting: Your Questions Answered
What is the core difference between HIFU and RF for HIFU vs RF Lifting?
HIFU (Ultherapy Prime / Sofwave) focuses ultrasound at fixed depths (1.5/3.0/4.5mm) to coagulate the SMAS, while monopolar RF (Thermage FLX) heats the entire dermis volumetrically up to 5-6mm. HIFU targets focal lift; RF targets diffuse tightening.
Who performs HIFU vs RF Lifting at RE:BERRY Gangnam?
Dr Yoon-Gon Ryu (License 131644), Medical Director and Aesthetic Medicine Specialist, personally performs every HIFU and RF session with zero rotation. He has completed over 4,000 ultrasound and RF lifting procedures and is Merz, Sofwave, and Solta Thermage trained.
How much does HIFU vs RF cost at RE:BERRY Gangnam?
Entry HIFU starts at ₩330,000 (about $236) (per 100 shots — courses start at 300 shots) for Ultherapy Prime 100 shots; entry RF is ₩1,990,000 (about $1,421) for Thermage FLX 600 shots.
| Modality | Device | RE:BERRY price | US comparable |
|---|---|---|---|
| HIFU | Ultherapy Prime 100 shots | ₩330,000 | $2,500-$3,500 |
| HIFU | Sofwave 100 shots | ₩990,000 | $1,500-$2,500 |
| RF | Thermage FLX 600 shots | ₩1,990,000 | $3,500-$5,000 |
| Combo | Signature Lifting Package | Ask at consultation | Not offered abroad |
Which is better for jowl and SMAS lift — HIFU or RF?
HIFU is generally preferred for jowl and SMAS-level lift because focused ultrasound reaches 4.5mm precisely while RF spreads energy volumetrically. Werschler 2016 and Alster-Tanzi 2012 document long-term HIFU vectoring outcomes. RE:BERRY Gangnam selects HIFU first for SMAS laxity patterns.
Which is better for diffuse skin laxity — HIFU or RF?
RF (Thermage FLX) is generally preferred for diffuse facial laxity and textural irregularity because monopolar RF heats the entire dermis volumetrically up to 5-6mm. Dover-Zelickson 2007 documented outcomes in 5,700 patients. RE:BERRY Gangnam selects Thermage for diffuse rather than focal laxity.
Can I combine HIFU and RF in one session?
Yes — combination is standard at RE:BERRY Gangnam. The Reberry Signature Lifting Package bundles 530 Ultherapy + 200 Sofwave + 100kJ Onda + 12,000 Revinas pulses, with optional add-on Thermage FLX 600 shots in the Premium Lifting Full Package.
How long do HIFU and RF results last respectively?
HIFU lifts typically last 12-18 months per session (Werschler 2016, sustained beyond 12 months); RF tightening typically lasts 12-24 months. Both rely on neocollagenesis over 90-180 days. RE:BERRY Gangnam recommends maintenance every 12-18 months for both modalities.
Is HIFU or RF more painful?
Most patients describe Ultherapy Prime SMAS-depth passes as moderate discomfort (hot pinprick), Sofwave SUPERB as mild, and Thermage FLX as moderate warming. RE:BERRY Gangnam applies topical anesthetic 30 minutes pre-procedure and offers oral analgesics on request.
Is downtime different between HIFU and RF for HIFU vs RF Lifting?
Both HIFU and RF are zero-downtime modalities — most patients return to work the same day. HIFU patients may experience mild erythema and transient tenderness 24-48 hours; RF patients may experience warmth and erythema 12-24 hours. Neither restricts flying.
Are HIFU and RF safe for Asian skin and Fitzpatrick IV-V?
Yes — Suh et al (Dermatol Surg, 2011) and Park, Lin, Suh (Med Lasers, 2021) document HIFU safety in Asian phototypes, while RF safety in Asian skin is established across decades of monopolar Thermage data. RE:BERRY Gangnam uses DeepSEE pre-treatment imaging for HIFU.
Can I discuss HIFU versus RF lifting in English at RE:BERRY Gangnam?
Yes. HIFU and RF consultations at RE:BERRY Gangnam have 5-language support (EN, ZH-CN, ZH-TW, JA, ES), and you can send jowl or laxity photos ahead on WhatsApp at +82-10-4201-9133. Lifting consults run 365 days a year, 10:00-20:00, at KI Tower B1-B2 beside Gangnam Station Exit 10.
What devices does RE:BERRY Gangnam use for HIFU vs RF Lifting?
Authentic Merz-certified Ultherapy Prime (with DeepSEE), Sofwave Medical SUPERB, and Solta Medical Thermage FLX. Every consumable cartridge is single-use and serialized — authenticity verifiable via manufacturer distributor records.
Can I add HIFU or RF to a Reberry Signature Package?
Yes — the Reberry Signature Lifting Package already includes 530 Ultherapy + 200 Sofwave + 100kJ Onda + 12,000 Revinas pulses, and the Premium Lifting Full Package adds Thermage FLX and Titanium 80kJ for full-stack HIFU + RF + Onda + Revinas + Titanium coverage.
How does HIFU + RF compare to a surgical facelift?
Neither HIFU nor RF can match the magnitude of a surgical SMAS facelift, but both avoid incisions, general anesthesia, and 14-21 day downtime.
| Factor | HIFU + RF combo | Surgical facelift |
|---|---|---|
| Incision | None | Pre/post-auricular |
| Downtime | 0-2 days | 14-21 days |
| Duration | 12-24 months | 7-10 years |
| Cost (Korea) | ₩2-10M | ₩15-30M |
How long does a HIFU + RF session take?
A full-face combined session at RE:BERRY Gangnam takes 90-150 minutes including topical anesthetic application, DeepSEE mapping, both device passes, and post-treatment LDM. Patients can fly the same day.
How do I book HIFU vs RF Lifting consultation at RE:BERRY Gangnam?
Book directly via WhatsApp at +82-10-4201-9133 — RE:BERRY Gangnam responds in English/JP/CN/ES within business hours (10:00-20:00 KST, 365 days). Dr Ryu personally reviews every pre-treatment photo and consultation request.
Are there contraindications for HIFU vs RF Lifting?
Both HIFU and RF are contraindicated in pregnancy, active facial infection, and metal implants in the treatment zone. RF is additionally contraindicated for patients with pacemakers. RE:BERRY Gangnam screens every patient via WhatsApp pre-consultation.
What aftercare does RE:BERRY Gangnam provide for HIFU vs RF Lifting?
Every patient receives post-treatment LDM therapy, an 5-language aftercare guide, and follow-up via WhatsApp at 24 hours, 7 days, and 90 days. Sun protection (SPF 50+), hydration, and avoidance of vigorous facial massage are emphasized during the first 14 days.
Ready to Decide Between HIFU and RF Lifting?
Bring your jowl and skin-laxity questions to Dr. Yoon-Gon Ryu, who weighs HIFU against RF on your own face at RE:BERRY Gangnam, a short walk from Gangnam Station Exit 10. Same-day appointments available 365 days per year.
Why Tens of Thousands of Foreign Patients Are Choosing This Gangnam Clinic — Business Wire, 2026-04-13
Book Your Personalized Consultation
Share your details and our multilingual team will contact you as soon as possible through your preferred messenger.
- ✓ Free online skin consultation with a doctor
- ✓ Personalized treatment plan & pricing
- ✓ 5-language support (EN/ZH-CN/ZH-TW/JA/ES)
- ✓ Response as soon as possible via your preferred messenger
How to Find RE:BERRY Gangnam
2 minutes from Gangnam Station Exit 10. B1–B2, KI Tower — the building with the all-black entrance you can't miss.
RE:BERRY Clinic Gangnam
B1–B2, KI Tower, 69-gil 8, Gangnam-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul
서울시 서초구 강남대로69길 8, 지하1·2층 (KI타워)
Also available at: Myeongdong · Incheon Airport