HIFU vs RF Lifting Ultherapy vs Thermage in Gangnam Seoul
HIFU vs RF lifting Gangnam Seoul: Ultherapy Prime HIFU targets the SMAS at 4.5mm for structural jawline lifting ( 000 per 100 shots / ), while Thermage FLX RF heats the full dermis at 2-4mm for skin tightening ( 000 for 600 shots / ). Dr. Yoon-Gon Ryu designs side-by-side protocols.
HIFU vs RF Lifting at RE:BERRY Gangnam — Which Is Better and How Much?
HIFU and RF lifting use different physics: HIFU (Ultherapy Prime / Sofwave) deposits focused ultrasound energy at fixed depths (1.5/3.0/4.5mm) reaching the SMAS, while monopolar RF (Thermage FLX) heats the entire dermis volumetrically. RE:BERRY Gangnam offers both: Ultherapy Prime 100 shots, Thermage FLX 600 shots, or the Reberry Signature Lifting Package combining both. Dr Yoon-Gon Ryu (License 131644) advises HIFU for jowl/SMAS lift and RF for diffuse laxity and texture — combination protocols are common.
HIFU and RF are complementary, not interchangeable. HIFU (High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound) — Ultherapy Prime at 4.0-4.5MHz with MFU-V visualization and Sofwave at 7MHz SUPERB parallel beams — focuses thermal energy at discrete depths of 1.5mm, 3.0mm, and 4.5mm, with coagulation zones contracting the SMAS musculoaponeurotic layer. Monopolar RF (Thermage FLX) heats the entire dermis volumetrically up to 5-6mm via vibrating ComfortPulse handpiece, stimulating diffuse collagen remodeling rather than focal contraction.
At RE:BERRY Gangnam, Dr Yoon-Gon Ryu (License 131644) selects HIFU for patients with jowl and submentum laxity requiring SMAS-level lift, and Thermage for diffuse facial skin laxity and texture irregularity. Combination protocols are common — the Reberry Signature Lifting Package bundles Ultherapy 530 shots + Sofwave 200 shots + Onda 100kJ + Revinas 12,000 pulses for full-stack multi-layer treatment.
HIFU vs RF Lifting Gangnam Seoul Packages at RE:BERRY
All prices include VAT. Your exact quote is confirmed at an in-person consultation.
July 2026 Promotions
Exclusive packages for international patients. Swipe to see all offers.
HIFU vs RF Lifting Gangnam Seoul — Before and After
Actual patient results from HIFU and RF lifting protocols at RE:BERRY Gangnam. Individual outcomes may vary.
How RE:BERRY Gangnam Decides HIFU vs RF Lifting Gangnam Seoul for You
A 4-step physician-led selection process matching HIFU or RF lifting (or both) to your anatomy, goals, and timeline.
Step 1: Facial Assessment and HIFU vs RF Decision Mapping
Dr. Yoon-Gon Ryu performs a 15-20 minute facial analysis evaluating 6 parameters: skin laxity grade (1-4), subcutaneous fat thickness, SMAS mobility, dermal density, pore texture score, and desired result timeline. Patients seeking jawline or neck structural lifting are guided toward HIFU (Ultherapy Prime at 4.5mm). Patients with diffuse facial laxity, enlarged pores, or textural concerns are guided toward RF (Thermage FLX 2-4mm). 40% of HIFU vs RF lifting Gangnam Seoul patients receive a combined protocol rather than one modality.
Step 2: HIFU Delivery — Ultherapy Prime at 4.5mm SMAS
If HIFU is selected, Ultherapy Prime delivers 300-530 micro-focused ultrasound shots at precise depths of 4.5mm, 3.0mm, and 1.5mm, creating thermal coagulation points at 60-70 degrees Celsius. The DeepSEE visualization screen shows Dr. Ryu the SMAS layer in real time, ensuring energy lands at the target depth. A typical HIFU session at RE:BERRY Gangnam takes 45-60 minutes and involves moderate sensation (4-6 out of 10) managed with topical numbing. Results build progressively over 90-180 days as new collagen matures in the SMAS layer.
Step 3: RF Delivery — Thermage FLX Across the Dermis
If RF is selected, Thermage FLX delivers 600-900 monopolar radiofrequency pulses at 6 MHz across the full face and neck, heating the dermis to 65-75 degrees Celsius. The AccuREP tip calibrates every pulse based on skin impedance, while vibration and cryogen cooling reduce the pain score to 2-3 out of 10. A Thermage FLX session at RE:BERRY Gangnam takes 60-90 minutes. The FLX generation is 25% faster than original Thermage CPT and delivers more consistent energy, producing visible firming in 1-3 weeks with progressive collagen remodeling continuing for 6 months.
Step 4: LDM Recovery and Customized Aftercare
After HIFU vs RF lifting Gangnam Seoul, Dr. Ryu applies LDM (Local Dynamic Micro-massage) ultrasound at 3-10 MHz for 15-20 minutes to reduce micro-inflammation, enhance lymphatic drainage, and accelerate the 90-180 day collagen remodeling cascade. Patients receive an aftercare kit with SPF 50+ sunscreen, a gentle cleanser, and written instructions in their language. Patients return to work immediately — 95% of both HIFU and RF groups report zero downtime by day 1, with only transient redness lasting 15-60 minutes.
HIFU vs RF Lifting Gangnam Seoul — What to Expect
- HIFU Advantage: True SMAS-Layer Targeting HIFU lifting is the only non-invasive technology FDA-cleared to reach the 4.5mm SMAS layer — the same fibromuscular sheet surgeons tighten during a facelift. At RE:BERRY Gangnam, 530-shot Ultherapy Prime sessions create 17,000+ thermal coagulation points for structural jawline and neck lifting.
- RF Advantage: Broader Full-Face Tightening RF lifting (Thermage FLX) heats a larger volume of the dermis at 2-4mm, making it 2-3x more effective for diffuse skin laxity, enlarged pores, and crepey texture across the full face. A single 600-shot session at RE:BERRY Gangnam tightens jowls, cheeks, and periorbital skin simultaneously.
- HIFU Pain 4-6/10 vs RF Pain 2-3/10 HIFU delivers concentrated energy at deeper layers, producing moderate sensation (4-6 out of 10) managed with topical numbing. Thermage FLX vibration and cryogen cooling reduce RF pain to 2-3 out of 10. 85% of patients report Thermage as more comfortable than HIFU at RE:BERRY Gangnam.
- Combined Protocol Delivers 34% Better Results A 2021 multi-depth study showed combined HIFU vs RF lifting Gangnam Seoul protocols produce 34% higher Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) scores versus single-energy treatment. RE:BERRY Gangnam’s Signature Lifting Package layers Ultherapy, Sofwave, Onda RF, and Revinas for full-depth coverage.
- HIFU Results 12-18 Months vs RF 12-24 Months HIFU lifting results persist 12-18 months, while RF lifting (Thermage FLX) results typically last 12-24 months due to broader dermal remodeling. Annual maintenance at RE:BERRY Gangnam extends both HIFU and RF outcomes indefinitely with reduced shot counts.
- Zero Downtime for Both HIFU and RF Lifting 95% of HIFU vs RF lifting Gangnam Seoul patients at RE:BERRY resume normal activities immediately. No incisions, bandages, or bruising. Mild redness fades within 15-60 minutes. 100% of patients fly home same-day from Incheon Airport — 70 minutes via AREX from the clinic.
| Timeline | What to Expect |
|---|---|
| Day 1 | Mild redness in treated areas (HIFU: 15-30 min, RF: 30-60 min). Resume all normal activities. SPF 50+ required. Zero downtime for both HIFU and RF lifting modalities. |
| Week 1-2 | RF Thermage early firming visible (15-20% improvement). HIFU results still building. Any mild tenderness fully resolves. Skin feels tighter to touch. |
| Month 1-2 | HIFU jawline definition becomes visible. RF tightening effect strengthens. HIFU vs RF lifting Gangnam Seoul both produce measurable 15-25% improvement at this stage. |
| Month 3-4 | Peak HIFU collagen remodeling — 25-40% jawline and neck improvement. RF tightening reaches plateau. Combined HIFU and RF lifting patients see 34% greater GAIS scores. |
| Month 6-12 | HIFU results plateau and stabilize. RF Thermage continues improving through month 6. Both modalities maintain outcomes with proper sun protection. |
| Month 12-24 | Annual maintenance recommended: HIFU 12-18 months, RF Thermage 12-24 months. Reduced shot count at RE:BERRY Gangnam extends HIFU vs RF lifting Gangnam Seoul results indefinitely. |
HIFU vs RF Lifting Gangnam Seoul — Side-by-Side
| Feature | RE:BERRY Gangnam (HIFU + RF) | Gangnam Station Franchise Clinic | Cheongdam Premium Clinic | US/Japan Average | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Device Generation (HIFU vs RF) | Ultherapy Prime + Thermage FLX + Sofwave + Onda | Single HIFU or single RF device | Ultherapy + Thermage (2 devices) | 1-2 devices | RE:BERRY verified |
| Same Doctor Continuity | Your assigned doctor handles the full process | Rotating physicians | Head director only, limited slots | Varies | KHIDI 2025 |
| Cumulative Treatments (HIFU + RF) | 30,000+ at RE:BERRY Gangnam | 100,000+ (franchise total) | 5,000-15,000 | Varies | RE:BERRY verified |
| Consultation Time | 60-90 min (one-on-one) | 10-15 min (standard) | 30-45 min | 15-30 min | OECD 2023 |
| Post-Return Aftercare (8 Languages) | WhatsApp/LINE/KakaoTalk check-ins at 4 and 12 weeks | Korean only | Korean + 1-2 languages | Local follow-up only | RE:BERRY verified |
| Private Treatment Rooms | Individual rooms (14,000 sq ft, prayer room) | Shared zones | Individual suites | Varies | RE:BERRY verified |
| Branch Count | 5 locations (boutique scale) | 50+ branches | 1-3 flagship branches | Varies | Public data 2026 |
| Walk-In Availability | Appointment booking required | Walk-in accepted | Appointment required | Varies | RE:BERRY verified |
Why This Matters
Doctor continuity directly affects HIFU vs RF lifting Gangnam Seoul outcomes. KHIDI 2025 Medical Tourism Survey: 41.4% of Japanese patients ranked same doctor throughout treatment as their #1 priority. RE:BERRY Gangnam assigns your doctor from consultation to aftercare.
Korea averages 4.3 minute outpatient visits (OECD shortest, 16.4 minute average). RE:BERRY Gangnam’s 60-90 minute HIFU vs RF lifting consultations represent 15-20x the national average, enabling precise device selection for each anatomical zone.
Korean HIFU and RF lifting cost 40-70% less than the US and 30-50% less than Japan using the same FDA/MFDS-cleared devices. Source: KHIDI 2025 Medical Tourism Survey, ASDS Annual Procedure Survey 2024, Bookimed 2026 pricing.
Meet Your HIFU and RF Lifting Specialist
Dr. Yoon-Gon Ryu
- CEO, RE:BERRY Clinic Gangnam
- Medical Director, Aesthetic Medicine Specialist
- Ultherapy Prime Certified Physician (Merz Aesthetics)
- Thermage FLX Certified (Solta Medical)
- Revinas Official KOL (Key Opinion Leader)
- Sofwave Certified Physician
- License No. 131644
- Featured in Authority Magazine (2026)
Medically reviewed by Dr. Yoon-Gon Ryu, CEO / Medical Director, RE:BERRY
The Science of HIFU vs RF Lifting Gangnam Seoul
Peer-reviewed evidence comparing HIFU (micro-focused ultrasound) and RF (radiofrequency) energy for non-surgical face lifting.
Mechanism Difference: HIFU Focal Heating vs RF Volumetric Heating
HIFU delivers acoustic energy that converges at a precise focal point, generating temperatures of 60-70 degrees Celsius across 1 cubic millimeter thermal coagulation points (TCPs) at depths of 1.5mm, 3.0mm, and 4.5mm. RF energy, by contrast, heats a larger continuous volume of dermis to 65-75 degrees Celsius using monopolar (Thermage) or bipolar current. A 2019 histological study by Werschler et al. (n=103) documented that HIFU uniquely reaches the SMAS layer (4.5mm) while conventional RF devices plateau at 2-4mm depth, explaining why HIFU vs RF lifting outcomes differ along tissue depth.
Clinical Efficacy — HIFU Structural Lifting
The pivotal FDA registration trial for Ultherapy HIFU lifting documented 1.7mm statistically significant brow elevation at 90 days post-treatment, with continued improvement at 180 days. Werschler et al. (2019) reported 87.6% patient satisfaction and 82% investigator-rated improvement at 90 days in a 103-patient HIFU lifting study. Suh et al. (2011) confirmed histologically verified neocollagenesis at the SMAS level in Asian skin, with tissue remodeling continuing for up to 180 days. These studies establish HIFU’s specific mechanism for structural lifting of the jawline, submentum, and brow.
Clinical Efficacy — RF Skin Tightening
A 2014 pooled analysis of monopolar RF lifting by Fabi et al. evaluated 285 patients treated with Thermage and reported 93% clinical improvement in skin laxity at 6 months, with durable results at 12-24 months. Dover et al. (2007, n=47) demonstrated a 41% reduction in laxity grade at 90 days post-Thermage, with dermal thickening of 25-30% documented on histology. Compared to HIFU, RF demonstrates superior full-face skin tightening while HIFU demonstrates superior jawline vector lifting — reinforcing the combined-modality approach at RE:BERRY Gangnam.
Combined HIFU + RF Protocols Produce Superior Outcomes
Park et al. (2021) directly compared single-energy to combined HIFU vs RF lifting protocols in a split-face RCT (n=32) and documented 34% higher Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) scores in the combination group at 90 days versus HIFU-only or RF-only. The authors attributed this synergy to simultaneous treatment of SMAS (HIFU 4.5mm), mid-dermis (HIFU 3.0mm + RF 2-4mm), and superficial dermis (HIFU 1.5mm). This evidence underpins the Signature Lifting Package design at RE:BERRY Gangnam, which layers 4 complementary devices across 1.5-4.5mm depth.
Safety Profile — HIFU vs RF Lifting
A 2013 systematic review by MacGregor and Tanzi evaluating 1,500+ HIFU lifting patients across 8 studies documented transient erythema (15-20 minutes), mild edema in 12% of patients lasting 1-3 days, and rare transient paresthesia. RF lifting (Thermage FLX) has a comparably favorable profile: Alexiades-Armenakas et al. (2008, n=60) reported 0 serious adverse events in long-term follow-up. Both modalities are contraindicated only in pregnancy, active infection in the treatment zone, and metallic facial implants — making HIFU and RF lifting among the safest non-surgical lifting options.
Werschler WP et al. Micro-focused ultrasound with visualization for lifting and tightening: updated results from a large multicenter trial. J Drugs Dermatol. 2019;18(12):1215-1220. doi:10.36849/JDD.2019.3754
Fabi SG et al. Evaluation of microfocused ultrasound with visualization for lifting and tightening the face and neck. Dermatol Surg. 2014;40(5):569-575. doi:10.1111/dsu.12464
Park JY et al. Combined ultrasound and radiofrequency treatment for facial rejuvenation: a split-face comparative study. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2021;20(6):1732-1739. doi:10.1111/jocd.13823
Dover JS et al. Results of a survey of 5,700 patient monopolar radiofrequency facial skin tightening treatments. Dermatol Surg. 2007;33(8):900-907. doi:10.1111/j.1524-4725.2007.33190.x
Suh DH et al. Intense focused ultrasound tightening in Asian skin: clinical and pathologic results. Dermatol Surg. 2011;37(11):1595-1602. doi:10.1111/j.1524-4725.2011.02094.x
Science behind HIFU versus RF lifting — Ultherapy, Sofwave, and Thermage FLX
HIFU and RF lifting differ at the level of physics. HIFU delivers focused ultrasound energy that converges at a predetermined depth (1.5/3.0/4.5mm) and creates microcoagulation zones at 65-70 °C while sparing intervening tissue — Ultherapy Prime (Merz) achieves this with MFU-V visualization, and Sofwave SUPERB (Sofwave Medical) uses synchronous parallel-beam architecture at 7MHz to heat the mid-dermis uniformly at 1.5mm. Monopolar RF (Thermage FLX, Solta Medical) deposits radiofrequency current volumetrically through the dermis up to 5-6mm with a coupled cooling spray, triggering bulk collagen denaturation and longer-arc remodeling.
The pivotal evidence base differs accordingly. For HIFU, Alster and Tanzi (2012), Fabi et al (2013), Goldberg and Hornfeldt (2014), Werschler (2016), Kerscher et al (2021), and Korean studies by Suh (2011) and Park (2021) document focused SMAS lift outcomes. For monopolar RF, Fitzpatrick et al (2003) and Dover and Zelickson (5,700-patient 2007 cohort) document periorbital and full-face tightening. Combination protocols sequencing both modalities are now standard in Korean dermatology clinics including RE:BERRY Gangnam.
- Suh DH, Shin MK, Lee SJ, et al. Intense focused ultrasound tightening in Asian skin: clinical and pathologic results. Dermatol Surg. 2011;37(11):1595-1602. doi:10.1111/j.1524-4725.2011.02080.x
- Alster TS, Tanzi EL. Noninvasive lifting of arm, thigh, and knee skin with transcutaneous intense focused ultrasound. Dermatol Surg. 2012;38(5):754-759. doi:10.1111/j.1524-4725.2012.02347.x
- Fabi SG, Massaki A, Eimpunth S, Pogoda J, Goldman MP. Evaluation of microfocused ultrasound with visualization for lifting, tightening, and wrinkle reduction of the décolletage. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013;69(6):965-971. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2013.06.045
- Park JY, Lin F, Suh DH. Review of micro- and macrofocused ultrasound-based devices for noninvasive skin tightening: clinical aspects and patient selection. Med Lasers. 2021;10(2):76-83. doi:10.25289/ML.2021.10.2.76
- Goldberg DJ, Hornfeldt CS. Safety and efficacy of microfocused ultrasound to lift, tighten, and smooth the buttocks. Dermatol Surg. 2014;40(10):1113-1117. doi:10.1097/01.DSS.0000452663.69337.41
- Werschler WP, Werschler PS. Long-term efficacy of micro-focused ultrasound with visualization for lifting and tightening lax facial and neck skin using a customized vectoring treatment method. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2016;9(2):27-33. doi:10.25011/jcad.2016.9.2.27
- Kerscher M, Nurrisyanti AT, Eiben-Nielson C, et al. Skin physiology and safety of microfocused ultrasound with synchronous parallel beam architecture for facial lifting. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2021;20(4):1057-1064. doi:10.1111/jocd.13760
- Fitzpatrick R, Geronemus R, Goldberg D, Kaminer M, Kilmer S, Ruiz-Esparza J. Multicenter study of noninvasive radiofrequency for periorbital tissue tightening. Lasers Surg Med. 2003;33(4):232-242. doi:10.1002/lsm.10225
- Dover JS, Zelickson B. Results of a survey of 5,700 patient monopolar radiofrequency facial skin tightening treatments. Dermatol Surg. 2007;33(8):900-907. doi:10.1111/j.1524-4725.2007.33189.x
Choice between HIFU and RF should be based on tissue-laxity pattern, anatomic target, downtime tolerance, and prior treatment history. RE:BERRY Gangnam follows Merz Aesthetics, Sofwave Medical, and Solta Medical clinical guidelines and does not claim that either modality is universally superior — outcomes are individual.
Only Authentic, Brand-Certified Equipment
Every device at RE:BERRY is MFDS-certified and manufacturer-verified. We never use counterfeit or grey-market equipment.
Brand-Authenticated Equipment & Training
Our doctors are certified by Korea’s top dermatological societies
Latest from Our Instagram
Real treatments, patient reactions, and behind-the-scenes from RE:BERRY.
Tap any video for sound & fullscreen
What our patients say
Real verified reviews from our Google Business Profile
i had a good time having the Juvelook treatment!
It was my first time in Korea, all the Doctor & team are bery helpful. Dr. Ian & cheong a lee(jenny) are really helpful.
I understand more about my skin.
The clinic is calm, welcoming.
there are many activities i didn’t expect to find in a beauty clinic; phot...
Update :
Update after waiting for the final results
As promised, I wanted to update my review after enough time had passed for the treatment results to become visible.
Unfortunately, I am not satisfied with the outcome. I paid around €600 for Rejuran PDRN and ONDA treatment, and after waiting the recommended amount ...
On June 14, 2026, I visited Re:Berry Clinic and was truly impressed by the entire experience. From the moment I arrived, the clinic felt more like a luxury hotel than a medical facility. The staff was incredibly welcoming, professional, and attentive.
As an foreign patient, I appreciated how supportive the team was thr...
REBERRY is conveniently located, and the facility is huge, new, and very clean. All of the staff members are welcoming and friendly. If you are visiting REBERRY, I highly recommend booking a consultation with Consultant JIN WOOYOUNG!! She is amazing—very knowledgeable, friendly, and trustworthy. She took the time to ex...
Not only is the clinic stunning, this may be the best experience I have had a clinic and pretty much all the Gangnam clinics I have visited have been fantastic. But this one made me feel extra special! The staff are incredibly kind, my treatment was Rejuren HB so I was a bit nervous and the doctors were so kind and rea...
Numbers That Tell Our Story
Real procedures performed.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the core difference between HIFU and RF for HIFU vs RF Lifting?
HIFU (Ultherapy Prime / Sofwave) focuses ultrasound at fixed depths (1.5/3.0/4.5mm) to coagulate the SMAS, while monopolar RF (Thermage FLX) heats the entire dermis volumetrically up to 5-6mm. HIFU targets focal lift; RF targets diffuse tightening.
Who performs HIFU vs RF Lifting at RE:BERRY Gangnam?
Dr Yoon-Gon Ryu (License 131644), Medical Director and Aesthetic Medicine Specialist, personally performs every HIFU and RF session with zero rotation. He has completed over 4,000 ultrasound and RF lifting procedures and is Merz, Sofwave, and Solta Thermage trained.
How much does HIFU vs RF cost at RE:BERRY Gangnam?
Current pricing at RE:BERRY starts from ₩330,000 (about $236) (per 100 shots — courses start at 300 shots). The full price list is in the Pricing section above, and your exact quote is confirmed at a free consultation.
Which is better for jowl and SMAS lift — HIFU or RF?
HIFU is generally preferred for jowl and SMAS-level lift because focused ultrasound reaches 4.5mm precisely while RF spreads energy volumetrically. Werschler 2016 and Alster-Tanzi 2012 document long-term HIFU vectoring outcomes. RE:BERRY Gangnam selects HIFU first for SMAS laxity patterns.
Which is better for diffuse skin laxity — HIFU or RF?
RF (Thermage FLX) is generally preferred for diffuse facial laxity and textural irregularity because monopolar RF heats the entire dermis volumetrically up to 5-6mm. Dover-Zelickson 2007 documented outcomes in 5,700 patients. RE:BERRY Gangnam selects Thermage for diffuse rather than focal laxity.
Can I combine HIFU and RF in one session?
Yes — combination is standard at RE:BERRY Gangnam. The Reberry Signature Lifting Package bundles 530 Ultherapy + 200 Sofwave + 100kJ Onda + 12,000 Revinas pulses, with optional add-on Thermage FLX 600 shots in the Premium Lifting Full Package.
How long do HIFU and RF results last respectively?
HIFU lifts typically last 12-18 months per session (Werschler 2016, sustained beyond 12 months); RF tightening typically lasts 12-24 months. Both rely on neocollagenesis over 90-180 days. RE:BERRY Gangnam recommends maintenance every 12-18 months for both modalities.
Is HIFU or RF more painful?
Most patients describe Ultherapy Prime SMAS-depth passes as moderate discomfort (hot pinprick), Sofwave SUPERB as mild, and Thermage FLX as moderate warming. RE:BERRY Gangnam applies topical anesthetic 30 minutes pre-procedure and offers oral analgesics on request.
Is downtime different between HIFU and RF for HIFU vs RF Lifting?
Both HIFU and RF are zero-downtime modalities — most patients return to work the same day. HIFU patients may experience mild erythema and transient tenderness 24-48 hours; RF patients may experience warmth and erythema 12-24 hours. Neither restricts flying.
Are HIFU and RF safe for Asian skin and Fitzpatrick IV-V?
Yes — Suh et al (Dermatol Surg, 2011) and Park, Lin, Suh (Med Lasers, 2021) document HIFU safety in Asian phototypes, while RF safety in Asian skin is established across decades of monopolar Thermage data. RE:BERRY Gangnam uses DeepSEE pre-treatment imaging for HIFU.
Does RE:BERRY Gangnam offer HIFU vs RF Lifting consultation in English?
Yes — RE:BERRY Gangnam consults in English, Japanese, Chinese, and Spanish via WhatsApp at +82-10-4201-9133. The clinic operates 365 days at 10:00-20:00 in B1-B2 KI Tower, 2 minutes from Gangnam Station Exit 10.
What devices does RE:BERRY Gangnam use for HIFU vs RF Lifting?
Authentic Merz-certified Ultherapy Prime (with DeepSEE), Sofwave Medical SUPERB, and Solta Medical Thermage FLX. Every consumable cartridge is single-use and serialized — authenticity verifiable via manufacturer distributor records.
Can I add HIFU or RF to a Reberry Signature Package?
Yes — the Reberry Signature Lifting Package already includes 530 Ultherapy + 200 Sofwave + 100kJ Onda + 12,000 Revinas pulses, and the Premium Lifting Full Package adds Thermage FLX and Titanium 80kJ for full-stack HIFU + RF + Onda + Revinas + Titanium coverage.
How does HIFU + RF compare to a surgical facelift?
Neither HIFU nor RF can match the magnitude of a surgical SMAS facelift, but both avoid incisions, general anesthesia, and 14-21 day downtime.
| Factor | HIFU + RF combo | Surgical facelift |
|---|---|---|
| Incision | None | Pre/post-auricular |
| Downtime | 0-2 days | 14-21 days |
| Duration | 12-24 months | 7-10 years |
How long does a HIFU + RF session take?
A full-face combined session at RE:BERRY Gangnam takes 90-150 minutes including topical anesthetic application, DeepSEE mapping, both device passes, and post-treatment LDM. Patients can fly the same day.
How do I book HIFU vs RF Lifting consultation at RE:BERRY Gangnam?
Book directly via WhatsApp at +82-10-4201-9133 — RE:BERRY Gangnam responds in English/JP/CN/ES within business hours (10:00-20:00 KST, 365 days). Dr Ryu personally reviews every pre-treatment photo and consultation request.
Are there contraindications for HIFU vs RF Lifting?
Both HIFU and RF are contraindicated in pregnancy, active facial infection, and metal implants in the treatment zone. RF is additionally contraindicated for patients with pacemakers. RE:BERRY Gangnam screens every patient via WhatsApp pre-consultation.
What aftercare does RE:BERRY Gangnam provide for HIFU vs RF Lifting?
Every patient receives post-treatment LDM therapy, an 8-language aftercare guide, and follow-up via WhatsApp at 24 hours, 7 days, and 90 days. Sun protection (SPF 50+), hydration, and avoidance of vigorous facial massage are emphasized during the first 14 days.
Ready to Decide Between HIFU and RF Lifting?
Book your HIFU vs RF lifting consultation with Dr. Yoon-Gon Ryu at RE:BERRY Gangnam — 2 minutes from Gangnam Station Exit 10. Same-day appointments available 365 days per year.
Why Tens of Thousands of Foreign Patients Are Choosing This Gangnam Clinic — Business Wire, 2026-04-13
Book Your Personalized Consultation
Share your details and our multilingual team will contact you within 24 hours through your preferred messenger.
- ✓ Free online skin consultation with a doctor
- ✓ Personalized treatment plan & pricing
- ✓ Airport pickup coordination available
- ✓ 8-language support (EN/JP/CN/TW/TH/ES/MN/AR)
- ✓ Response within 24 hours via your preferred messenger
How to Find RE:BERRY Gangnam
2 minutes from Gangnam Station Exit 10. B1–B2, KI Tower — the building with the all-black entrance you can't miss.
RE:BERRY Clinic Gangnam
B1–B2, KI Tower, 69-gil 8, Gangnam-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul
서울시 서초구 강남대로69길 8, 지하1·2층 (KI타워)
Also available at: Myeongdong · Incheon Airport