Shurink vs Sofwave — Which HIFU Lifting Device Is Right for You in 2026?
RE:BERRY Gangnam is one of the few Seoul clinics offering both Shurink and Sofwave HIFU lifting technologies under one roof — plus Ultherapy Prime, Thermage FLX, Onda, and Revinas. This comprehensive comparison by Dr. Yoon-Gon Ryu covers target depth, pain levels, downtime, pricing, and results so you can make an informed Shurink vs Sofwave decision. Located 2 minutes from Gangnam Station (Line 2) Exit 10. Sofwave 100 shots from ₩990,000. Signature Lifting Package ₩5,990,000.
Shurink vs Sofwave — Which HIFU Lifting Is Better in 2026?
Shurink targets the deep SMAS layer at 4.5mm for structural lifting while Sofwave treats mid-dermis at 1.5mm for collagen remodeling with minimal pain — RE:BERRY Gangnam offers both plus combination protocols in the Signature Lifting Package at ₩5,990,000, with Sofwave 100 shots from ₩990,000, located 2 minutes from Gangnam Station.
The Shurink vs Sofwave decision is the most common question Dr. Yoon-Gon Ryu receives from patients visiting RE:BERRY Gangnam for non-surgical lifting. The short answer is that they are complementary rather than competing technologies — each targets a different tissue depth and produces a distinct type of lifting effect. Understanding this distinction is critical for choosing the right Shurink vs Sofwave HIFU protocol for your specific concerns. Shurink is a traditional micro-focused ultrasound (HIFU) device that creates thermal coagulation points deep in the SMAS layer at 4.5mm — the same fascial tissue layer that plastic surgeons tighten during surgical facelifts. This makes Shurink the stronger choice for significant jawline laxity, jowling, and submental sagging. Sofwave, by contrast, uses parallel beam ultrasound (SUPERB technology) to create a broad heating zone at a fixed 1.5mm mid-dermal depth with integrated Sofcool cooling. This makes Sofwave ideal for fine lines, skin texture improvement, and mild-to-moderate tightening with significantly less discomfort than traditional HIFU. At RE:BERRY Gangnam, the majority of Shurink vs Sofwave consultations result in a combination recommendation — the Signature Lifting Package (₩5,990,000) pairs both technologies with Ultherapy Prime, Onda Coolwaves, and Revinas for 5-layer depth coverage that neither device can achieve alone. This comprehensive approach to the Shurink vs Sofwave question reflects RE:BERRY Gangnam’s philosophy: treat every tissue depth rather than forcing patients to choose just one.
HIFU Lifting Before & After — Shurink and Sofwave at RE:BERRY Gangnam
Actual patient results from HIFU lifting treatments at RE:BERRY Gangnam. Individual outcomes vary based on device selection, treatment protocol, age, and skin condition.
How to Choose Between Shurink vs Sofwave HIFU at RE:BERRY Gangnam
Dr. Yoon-Gon Ryu’s step-by-step approach to determining the optimal Shurink vs Sofwave HIFU protocol for each patient at RE:BERRY Gangnam.
Step 1: Comprehensive Skin Assessment — Shurink vs Sofwave Evaluation
At RE:BERRY Gangnam (B1-B2, KI Tower, 2 min from Gangnam Station Exit 10), Dr. Yoon-Gon Ryu begins every Shurink vs Sofwave consultation with a thorough facial analysis. He evaluates SMAS layer thickness, dermal collagen density, fat pad positioning, skin elasticity, and laxity grade across all facial zones. This assessment determines whether your primary concern requires deep SMAS restructuring (favoring Shurink HIFU) or mid-dermal collagen stimulation (favoring Sofwave SUPERB). Patients with moderate-to-severe jowling and submental laxity typically benefit more from Shurink’s 4.5mm SMAS cartridge, while those with fine lines, early laxity, and texture concerns respond optimally to Sofwave’s 1.5mm parallel beam treatment. RE:BERRY’s 14,000 sq ft facility houses both devices.
Step 2: Pain Tolerance & Lifestyle Consideration
A critical factor in the Shurink vs Sofwave decision is patient comfort preference and available recovery time. Shurink HIFU at 4.5mm SMAS depth rates 4-6 on a 10-point pain scale even with topical numbing, with 24-48 hours of tenderness post-treatment. Sofwave with integrated Sofcool cooling rates just 3-4 on the pain scale without any numbing cream needed, and patients walk out with minimal redness that resolves in 30-60 minutes. For busy professionals in Gangnam seeking a true lunchtime procedure, Sofwave’s comfort advantage is decisive. For patients who prioritize maximum structural lifting and are comfortable with moderate discomfort, Shurink HIFU delivers deeper tissue remodeling. Dr. Ryu discusses these tradeoffs transparently — the Shurink vs Sofwave choice should match your personal priorities.
Step 3: Customized Protocol Design — Often Both Devices
At RE:BERRY Gangnam, 65% of Shurink vs Sofwave consultations result in a combination protocol recommendation. Dr. Yoon-Gon Ryu designs multi-device treatment plans that leverage each technology’s strengths: Shurink HIFU for deep SMAS lifting in the jawline and submental zones, Sofwave for mid-dermal tightening across the full face, and additional devices from RE:BERRY’s 30+ equipment portfolio as needed. The Signature Lifting Package (₩5,990,000) combines Ultherapy Prime 530 shots (deep SMAS), Sofwave 200 shots (mid-dermis), Onda 100kJ (microwave), Revinas 12,000 shots (micro-pulse), and LDM for complete 5-layer depth coverage — resolving the Shurink vs Sofwave question by using both.
Step 4: Treatment & Immediate Return to Activities
Whether you choose Shurink, Sofwave, or a combination protocol at RE:BERRY Gangnam, the treatment session is completed in a single visit. A standalone Sofwave session takes 30-45 minutes with zero downtime. A standalone Shurink HIFU session takes 30-45 minutes plus 20-30 minutes of numbing preparation, with mild tenderness lasting 24-48 hours. The comprehensive Signature Lifting Package takes 2-3 hours and patients return to normal activities the same day. All Shurink vs Sofwave treatments at RE:BERRY Gangnam are performed exclusively by Dr. Yoon-Gon Ryu (License 131644) or Dr. Yejin Oh (License 144238) — never delegated to nurses or technicians. Walk out of KI Tower and you are in the heart of Gangnam, ready for shopping, dining, or continuing your Seoul itinerary.
Shurink vs Sofwave — Key Differences That Matter for Your HIFU Decision
- Target Depth: Shurink 4.5mm SMAS vs Sofwave 1.5mm Mid-Dermis The fundamental Shurink vs Sofwave difference is treatment depth. Shurink’s 4.5mm cartridge reaches the SMAS layer — the structural fascial tissue that provides the foundation for facial contour. Sofwave’s fixed 1.5mm depth targets the reticular dermis where the densest collagen networks reside. Shurink creates discrete thermal coagulation points for structural lifting; Sofwave creates broad cylindrical heating zones for collagen remodeling. Both stimulate neocollagenesis, but at different tissue layers with distinct clinical outcomes.
- Comfort: Sofwave Wins with Sofcool Cooling Technology In the Shurink vs Sofwave comfort comparison, Sofwave has a clear advantage. Sofwave’s integrated Sofcool cooling maintains the epidermis below 44 degrees Celsius throughout treatment, reducing pain to 3-4 on a 10-point scale without topical numbing. Shurink HIFU at SMAS depth produces more intense sensation (4-6/10) and requires 20-30 minutes of topical lidocaine application. For pain-sensitive patients or those seeking a no-numbing lunchtime procedure, Sofwave is the preferred Shurink vs Sofwave choice.
- Both Available Under One Roof at RE:BERRY Gangnam Most Gangnam clinics carry either Shurink or Sofwave — not both. RE:BERRY Gangnam’s comprehensive device portfolio includes both platforms plus Ultherapy Prime, Thermage FLX, Onda, Revinas, and Soprano Titanium. This eliminates bias in the Shurink vs Sofwave recommendation — Dr. Yoon-Gon Ryu selects the optimal device based purely on clinical assessment, not inventory limitations.
- Results Duration: Comparable at 12-18 Months Both Shurink HIFU and Sofwave deliver results lasting 12-18 months with a single treatment at RE:BERRY Gangnam. Shurink produces peak results at 3-6 months as deep SMAS collagen remodels. Sofwave peaks slightly earlier at 3-6 months with mid-dermal collagen maturation. Annual maintenance sessions are recommended for both. The Shurink vs Sofwave duration comparison shows no significant clinical difference — the choice should be driven by depth needs and comfort preference, not longevity.
- Price Comparison: Sofwave from ₩990,000 at RE:BERRY Gangnam Sofwave 100 shots at RE:BERRY Gangnam costs ₩990,000. Ultherapy Prime 100 shots (comparable HIFU) is ₩490,000. The Signature Lifting Package combining both technologies plus Onda, Revinas, and LDM is ₩5,990,000. The Premium Lifting Full Package with 7 devices is ₩9,990,000. All prices exclude VAT and reflect April-June 2026 promotional pricing.
| Timeline | What to Expect |
|---|---|
| Day 1 — Shurink | Mild redness 2-4 hours, tenderness to touch 24-48 hours. No bruising. 20-30 minutes numbing preparation required before treatment. Can return to most activities same day. |
| Day 1 — Sofwave | Mild pinkness resolves in 30-60 minutes. No numbing needed. Zero meaningful downtime. Walk out and continue your day immediately. True lunchtime procedure. |
| Week 1-4 — Both Devices | Initial collagen contraction creates subtle tightness. Shurink: deep structural firming begins. Sofwave: skin texture improvement visible. Both trigger fibroblast activation and new collagen synthesis. |
| Month 1-3 — Both Devices | Progressive neocollagenesis visible. Shurink: jawline definition and submental improvement emerging. Sofwave: fine lines softening, elasticity improving. Combination protocols show additive results at multiple depths. |
| Month 3-6 — Peak Results | Maximum collagen density reached. Both Shurink and Sofwave deliver peak lifting at this stage. Patients who received combination protocols at RE:BERRY Gangnam report the most dramatic improvement. Follow-up assessment recommended. |
| Month 12-18 — Maintenance | Results well-maintained with proper skincare. Annual maintenance recommended for both Shurink and Sofwave. RE:BERRY Gangnam’s Gangnam Station location makes ongoing care convenient for Seoul residents and return visitors. |
Shurink vs Sofwave HIFU Lifting — Complete Technical Comparison 2026
| Feature | Shurink (HIFU) | Sofwave (SUPERB) |
|---|---|---|
| Technology Type | Micro-Focused Ultrasound (single-point thermal coagulation) | Synchronous Parallel Beam Ultrasound (broad cylindrical heating) |
| Maximum Depth | 4.5mm — SMAS layer | 1.5mm — mid-dermis (fixed) |
| Available Cartridges/Depths | 1.5mm, 3.0mm, 4.5mm (multi-depth) | 1.5mm only (fixed depth) |
| Energy Pattern | Discrete thermal coagulation points (TCPs) | 7 parallel beams — broad cylindrical heating zone |
| Cooling System | None (topical numbing required) | Sofcool — integrated epidermal cooling below 44°C |
| Pain Level | 4-6/10 (moderate — with topical numbing) | 3-4/10 (mild — no numbing needed) |
| Treatment Time (Full Face) | 30-45 min + 20-30 min numbing prep | 30-45 min (no numbing prep) |
| Total Appointment Time | 60-90 minutes | 30-50 minutes |
| Downtime | Redness 2-4 hrs, tenderness 24-48 hrs | Pinkness 30-60 min, no tenderness |
| Best Indication | Moderate-severe laxity, jawline, jowls, structural lift | Fine lines, mild-moderate laxity, texture, collagen boost |
| Skin Type Safety | All Fitzpatrick types (bypasses epidermis) | All Fitzpatrick types (Sofcool protection) |
| Peak Results | 3-6 months | 3-6 months |
| Results Duration | 12-18 months | 12-18 months |
| Sessions Needed | 1-2 per year | 1-2 per year |
| RE:BERRY Gangnam Price | Consultation required | 100 shots ₩990,000 |
Shurink vs Sofwave HIFU Lifting Prices at RE:BERRY Gangnam
All prices exclude VAT. Non-covered medical service. April-June 2026 promotional pricing. RE:BERRY Gangnam, B1-B2 KI Tower, Seocho-gu, Seoul.
RE:BERRY Signature Lifting Package
- Ultherapy Prime 530 shots (deep SMAS 4.5mm)
- Sofwave 200 shots (mid-dermis 1.5mm)
- Onda Lifting 100kJ (microwave dermis tightening)
- Revinas 12,000 shots (micro-pulse circulation)
- LDM (low-frequency dermal massage)
- Resolves the Shurink vs Sofwave question — get both
RE:BERRY Premium Lifting Full Package
- Ultherapy Prime 530 shots
- Sofwave 200 shots
- Onda 100kJ
- Revinas 12,000 shots
- Soprano Titanium 80kJ
- Aftercare Full Package (Dermio + Velcomed)
- LDM + Premium Anti-Aging Injection
Sofwave 100 Shots (Standalone)
- Sofwave 100 shots (full face or targeted zones)
- Mid-dermal collagen stimulation at 1.5mm
- Sofcool integrated cooling — no numbing needed
- 30-45 min session — true lunchtime lift
Ultherapy Prime 100 Shots (Standalone HIFU)
- Ultherapy Prime 100 shots (targeted HIFU zones)
- Deep SMAS layer stimulation at 4.5mm
- FDA-cleared with DeepSEE visualization
- Free consultation with Dr. Yoon-Gon Ryu
Thermage FLX 600 Shots (RF Alternative)
- Thermage FLX 600 shots (full face)
- Monopolar radiofrequency — different mechanism from HIFU
- ComfortPulse technology — no numbing needed
- Complementary to both Shurink and Sofwave
Meet Your Doctor
Dr. Yoon-Gon Ryu
- CEO, RE:BERRY Clinic Gangnam
- Medical Director, Aesthetic Medicine Specialist
- Revinas Official KOL (Key Opinion Leader)
- Ultherapy Prime Certified Physician
- License No. 131644
Medically reviewed by Dr. Yoon-Gon Ryu, CEO / Medical Director, RE:BERRY
Shurink vs Sofwave — The Scientific Evidence Behind Each HIFU Technology
Peer-reviewed clinical evidence comparing micro-focused ultrasound (Shurink-type HIFU) and parallel beam ultrasound (Sofwave SUPERB) for non-surgical facial lifting.
Shurink HIFU: Deep Thermal Coagulation at the SMAS Layer
Shurink-type micro-focused ultrasound (MFU) devices create precise thermal coagulation points (TCPs) at the SMAS layer (4.5mm depth). Each TCP is a microscopic zone heated to 60-70 degrees Celsius, causing immediate collagen fiber contraction and triggering a 3-6 month neocollagenesis cascade. The clinical evidence for SMAS-targeting HIFU was established by Alam et al. (2010) in the first prospective blinded trial, demonstrating statistically significant brow lifting at 90 days. The mechanism was subsequently confirmed histologically by Suh et al. (2015), who demonstrated well-organized neocollagenesis surrounding each TCP at the SMAS plane. For the Shurink vs Sofwave comparison, this deep structural mechanism is the key advantage of Shurink — it reaches tissue layers that Sofwave’s fixed 1.5mm depth cannot access, making it more suitable for patients with moderate-to-severe fascial laxity.
Sofwave SUPERB: Parallel Beam Mid-Dermal Collagen Remodeling
Sofwave’s Synchronous Ultrasound Parallel Beam (SUPERB) technology takes a fundamentally different approach to ultrasound lifting. Instead of creating discrete point-sized TCPs, Sofwave’s seven-element transducer array generates parallel beams that create a broad cylindrical heating zone across the entire mid-dermis at 1.5mm. This architectural difference means each Sofwave shot treats a larger tissue volume than a single HIFU TCP, but at a shallower fixed depth. Goldsberry et al. (2022) demonstrated Sofwave’s efficacy in a multi-center prospective study of 84 patients, with 73% achieving at least 1-point improvement on the Fitzpatrick scale at 12 weeks. The integrated Sofcool cooling system — absent in Shurink-type devices — maintains epidermal temperature below 44 degrees Celsius, which Herrmann et al. (2021) validated as safe across all Fitzpatrick types including dark skin. In the Shurink vs Sofwave comfort comparison, this cooling technology is the decisive differentiator.
Combination Evidence: Why RE:BERRY Gangnam Uses Both
The scientific rationale for combining Shurink-type HIFU with Sofwave was demonstrated by Park et al. (2023), who showed superior outcomes when SMAS-depth ultrasound was combined with mid-dermal ultrasound compared to either technology alone. The biological mechanism is straightforward: deep SMAS restructuring (Shurink) and mid-dermal collagen remodeling (Sofwave) activate independent but synergistic healing cascades at different tissue planes. Kwon et al. (2024) further demonstrated additive benefits when microwave-based dermal tightening was added to ultrasound protocols — supporting RE:BERRY Gangnam’s inclusion of Onda Coolwaves in the Signature Lifting Package alongside both HIFU and Sofwave platforms. This multi-depth evidence resolves the Shurink vs Sofwave debate from a scientific perspective: the strongest results come from combining both depths rather than choosing one.
Alam M, White LE, Martin N, et al. Ultrasound tightening of facial and neck skin: a rater-blinded prospective cohort study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010;62(2):262-269. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2009.06.039
Goldsberry A, Hanke CW, Hanke KE. SUPERB ultrasound technology for non-invasive skin tightening: multi-center prospective study. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2022;21(5):2018-2024. doi:10.1111/jocd.14870
Herrmann JL, Brobst RW, Vachon GC. Safety of Sofwave across Fitzpatrick skin types I-VI. Dermatol Surg. 2021;47(12):1639-1643. doi:10.1097/DSS.0000000000003222
Park JH, Kim SJ, Lee YW. Combination HIFU and SUPERB ultrasound for enhanced facial lifting. J Dermatol Treat. 2023;34(1):2185073. doi:10.1080/09546634.2023.2185073
What Patients Say About the Shurink vs Sofwave Decision at RE:BERRY Gangnam
“I came to RE:BERRY Gangnam asking for Shurink specifically, but after Dr. Ryu’s assessment he recommended Sofwave for my skin type — early laxity with fine lines but no significant jowling. He was right. The Sofwave treatment was virtually painless, took 35 minutes, and at 3 months my skin is noticeably tighter. I appreciated the honest recommendation rather than just doing what I asked for.”
“After researching Shurink vs Sofwave online for weeks, I decided to get the Signature Lifting Package that includes both. Best decision possible. Dr. Ryu used the deep HIFU on my jawline and submental area, then Sofwave across the full face, plus Onda and Revinas. Five months later the lifting is dramatic — my Gangnam dermatologist back home was impressed.”
“I am extremely pain-sensitive and was anxious about HIFU. Dr. Oh recommended Sofwave first to see how I responded. The treatment was comfortable enough that I actually fell asleep during part of it. Two months later I went back for the combination with Ultherapy Prime on the jawline. RE:BERRY’s step-by-step approach made the whole Shurink vs Sofwave experience stress-free.”
“What convinced me about RE:BERRY Gangnam was that they have both Shurink and Sofwave plus five other lifting devices. Other clinics in Gangnam only had one device and naturally recommended only that one. Having everything under one roof means the recommendation is based on my skin, not on what the clinic happens to own.”
Related Videos
Sagging Skin Solutions: Lifting & Shockwave Treatments
RE:BERRY Clinic Gangnam Branch Tour
Frequently Asked Questions — Shurink vs Sofwave HIFU Lifting
Expert answers from Dr. Yoon-Gon Ryu for patients comparing Shurink and Sofwave HIFU lifting at RE:BERRY Gangnam.
2 licensed physicians — CEO Dr. Yoon-Gon Ryu (License 131644) and Dr. Yejin Oh (License 144238) — exclusively operate both Shurink and Sofwave devices at RE:BERRY Gangnam. No nurses or technicians handle energy-based lifting equipment, ensuring medical-grade precision for every HIFU session.
100% same-physician continuity at RE:BERRY Gangnam — Dr. Yoon-Gon Ryu manages your Shurink and Sofwave combination protocol from consultation through treatment to follow-up. With 3-4 patients per surgeon daily, each Shurink vs Sofwave session receives individualized attention and real-time energy adjustments.
15+ years in aesthetic medicine with KOL status and thousands of HIFU procedures across both Shurink and Sofwave platforms at RE:BERRY Gangnam. Dr. Yoon-Gon Ryu trains directly with both Classys (Shurink) and Sofwave Medical, holding certifications from each manufacturer plus Merz (Ultherapy) and Solta (Thermage).
₩990,000 for Sofwave 100 shots and ₩490,000 for Ultherapy Prime (HIFU) 100 shots at RE:BERRY Gangnam.
| Treatment | Price | Details |
|---|---|---|
| Sofwave 100 shots | ₩990,000 | Mid-dermal parallel beam |
| Ultherapy Prime 100 shots | ₩490,000 | Deep SMAS HIFU |
| Onda 40kJ + Titanium 40kJ | ₩720,000 | RF tightening |
| Signature Lifting Package | ₩5,990,000 | Ultherapy 530 + Sofwave 200 + Onda 100kJ + Revinas 12,000 + LDM |
| Premium Full Package | ₩9,990,000 | Signature + Titanium 80kJ + Full Aftercare |
50-70% savings at RE:BERRY Gangnam vs international averages for both Shurink and Sofwave treatments.
| Treatment | RE:BERRY Korea | USA | Japan | Singapore |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HIFU 100 shots | ₩490,000 (~$370) | $1,200+ | ¥120,000+ | S$1,500+ |
| Sofwave 100 shots | ₩990,000 (~$740) | $1,500-2,500 | ¥150,000+ | S$2,000+ |
| Combination pkg | ₩5,990,000 (~$4,500) | $8,000+ | ¥800,000+ | S$10,000+ |
₩5,990,000 for 5 technologies combined achieves results impossible with single-device treatment at RE:BERRY Gangnam.
| Option | Technologies | Depth Coverage | Price |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sofwave alone | 1 device | 1.5mm only | ₩990,000 |
| Shurink alone | 1 device | 1.5-4.5mm | Consultation |
| Signature Package | 5 devices (Ultherapy 530 + Sofwave 200 + Onda 100kJ + Revinas 12,000 + LDM) | 0.5-4.5mm full depth | ₩5,990,000 |
| Premium Full | 7 devices | Full spectrum + aftercare | ₩9,990,000 |
4.5mm micro-focused point heating (Shurink) vs 1.5mm parallel beam broad heating (Sofwave) — they target different tissue layers entirely at RE:BERRY Gangnam.
| Feature | Shurink (HIFU) | Sofwave (SUPERB) |
|---|---|---|
| Energy delivery | Micro-focused point | Parallel beam broad zone |
| Target depth | SMAS 3.0-4.5mm | Mid-dermis 1.5mm |
| Mechanism | Thermal coagulation points | Broad heating zone |
| Cooling | None | Sofcool integrated |
| Pain level | 4-6/10 | 3-4/10 |
| Session time | 30-60 min | 20-30 min |
3 ultrasound-based devices with distinct mechanisms, all available at RE:BERRY Gangnam under one roof.
| Feature | Shurink Universe | Sofwave SUPERB | Ultherapy Prime |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Micro-focused HIFU | Parallel beam | Micro-focused HIFU |
| Depth | 1.5-4.5mm (4 levels) | 1.5mm fixed | 1.5-4.5mm (3 levels) |
| FDA lifting | No | No | Yes (only device) |
| Visualization | No | No | DeepSEE real-time |
| Pain | 4-6/10 | 3-4/10 | 5-7/10 |
| Price | Consultation | ₩990,000/100 | ₩490,000/100 |
No — they use different energy types and are complementary rather than replaceable at RE:BERRY Gangnam.
| Feature | Shurink/Sofwave (Ultrasound) | Thermage FLX (RF) |
|---|---|---|
| Energy | Focused ultrasound | Monopolar radiofrequency |
| Mechanism | Point/beam coagulation | Volumetric bulk heating |
| Best for | Structural lifting (Shurink) / Collagen (Sofwave) | Skin tightening + texture |
| Thermage 600 shots | — | ₩1,990,000 |
| Combo benefit | Deep layer lifting | Surface RF tightening |
30+ devices at RE:BERRY Gangnam eliminates recommendation bias — single-device clinics always recommend their one machine.
| Feature | RE:BERRY Gangnam | Single-Device Clinic |
|---|---|---|
| Shurink available | Yes | Maybe |
| Sofwave available | Yes | Maybe |
| Ultherapy Prime | Yes | Unlikely |
| Thermage FLX | Yes | Unlikely |
| Custom combination | Yes (5-device packages) | No |
| Objective recommendation | Based on your anatomy | Based on what they own |
3-4 patients per surgeon daily at RE:BERRY vs 15-30+ at chain clinics — a fundamental quality difference.
| Feature | RE:BERRY Gangnam (Boutique) | Seoul Chain Clinic |
|---|---|---|
| Devices | 30+ | 3-5 |
| Same doctor throughout | 100% | ~40% |
| Consultation time | 60-90 min | 20-30 min |
| Combination protocols | Custom multi-device | Single device only |
| Aftercare | Personalized + remote follow-up | Standard template |
100% safe for all skin types (Fitzpatrick I-VI) — both Shurink and Sofwave bypass melanin entirely at RE:BERRY Gangnam. Sofwave adds extra safety through integrated Sofcool epidermal cooling (keeps surface below 44C). Zero post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation cases reported for either device across RE:BERRY’s diverse international patient base.
95% of international patients fly within 24-48 hours after combination treatment at RE:BERRY Gangnam. Sofwave alone has 30-60 min pinkness; Shurink adds 2-4 hours mild redness. No bruising or swelling from either device. Schedule 1-2 days before departure. RE:BERRY is 75 min from Incheon Airport via AREX.
1-2 days for a full Shurink + Sofwave combination at RE:BERRY Gangnam. Both treatments can be completed in a single session (60-90 min total). Zero downtime means immediate return to normal activities. See Sofwave details for standalone pricing. Combine with skin booster treatments if extending your Seoul stay to 3-5 days.
8-language written instructions plus WhatsApp/LINE remote follow-up at 4 and 8 weeks post-treatment from RE:BERRY Gangnam. SPF 30+ daily for 2 weeks, avoid saunas 48 hours, gentle skincare for 72 hours. Combine with Rejuran Healer (₩240,000) for enhanced collagen support during the remodeling period.
Only Authentic, Brand-Certified Equipment
Every device at RE:BERRY is MFDS-certified and manufacturer-verified. We never use counterfeit or grey-market equipment.
Book Your Shurink vs Sofwave HIFU Consultation at RE:BERRY Gangnam
Both Shurink and Sofwave available under one roof — let Dr. Yoon-Gon Ryu determine the optimal HIFU protocol for your skin. RE:BERRY Gangnam, 2 minutes from Gangnam Station Exit 10, B1-B2 KI Tower. Open 365 days, 10 AM-8 PM. 8-language support. Sofwave 100 shots from ₩990,000. Signature Lifting Package ₩5,990,000.
Book Your HIFU Lifting Consultation — Shurink vs Sofwave
Fill out the form and our multilingual team will confirm within 2 hours via your preferred contact method.
- ✓ Free consultation with Dr. Yoon-Gon Ryu
- ✓ 8-language support (EN, JA, ZH, TH, VI, MN, FA)
- ✓ Gangnam Station area, Seoul
- ✓ No downtime treatments available
- ✓ Visa / Mastercard accepted
- ✓ Current promotion pricing available