XERF vs Thermage FLX Gangnam Seoul Korea — Dual-Frequency vs Single-Frequency Monopolar RF
XERF delivers 6.78MHz + 2MHz dual-frequency monopolar RF energy through spider-pattern electrodes, reaching the SMAS layer for immediate tightening and progressive collagen remodeling — developed in Korea, FDA-cleared 2025, no needles.
Dual-Frequency Monopolar RF · Developed in Korea · FDA-Cleared 2025
XERF
XERF Lifting · Gangnam Seoul
XERF delivers 6.78MHz + 2MHz dual-frequency monopolar RF energy through spider-pattern electrodes, reaching the SMAS layer for immediate tightening and progressive collagen remodeling — developed in Korea, FDA-cleared 2025, no needles.
Across RE:BERRY Clinics
30,000+ Treatments
Direct Consult & Treatment
Medical Director
Minutes from ICN Airport
Incheon AirportEffects & Progress
Effects & Progress
Dual-frequency RF (6.78MHz + 2MHz) allows precise depth selection from surface to SMAS — a single session addresses multiple tissue layers simultaneously.
Mild redness and a sensation of warmth at the treated area immediately after. This typically resolves within a few hours. Skin may feel slightly firmer from the first session.
Redness has resolved. Early firming is consolidating. This is the period before collagen remodeling reaches its peak, typically 4–6 weeks after treatment.
Collagen and elastin remodeling peaks at 1–3 months. Jawline definition, skin texture, and overall contour improvements become more visible. Response varies by individual.
Maintenance period. Based on your response, RE:BERRY will advise on the optimal repeat interval to sustain results — typically in line with your skin's natural remodeling cycle.
Before & After
XERF Lifting Results at RE:BERRY Gangnam
※ Photos are published with the patient’s consent and show the same person before and after treatment. Timing and conditions are as stated; images are unretouched. Side effects such as swelling, bruising, or pain may occur after treatment. Individual results may vary.
Treatment Process
XERF Lifting — 4 Steps from Consultation to Aftercare
※ Illustrative images are AI-generated to help explain the treatment process.Effects & Progress
Effects & Progress
By combining 6.78MHz (shallower penetration) and 2MHz (deeper penetration) monopolar RF, XERF selects the optimal depth per facial zone in a single session. Energy reaches the SMAS layer for structural lifting while simultaneously stimulating dermal collagen — developed in Korea, FDA-cleared in the US in 2025.
The patent-pending spider-pattern electrode design distributes RF current uniformly rather than concentrating it at contact points. Combined with real-time impedance feedback, this maintains consistent energy delivery across curved and irregular facial surfaces, supporting even collagen remodeling throughout the treatment zone.
The XERF effector system includes four tip sizes: 05 (5×10mm, narrow zones and delicate areas), 10 (10×10mm, curved contours), 40 (20×20mm, mid-face coverage), and 60 (20×30mm, broad areas, up to 600 shots). The physician selects tips per zone within a single session, adapting energy and coverage to your anatomy.
XERF combines two mechanisms: immediate tissue contraction from RF heat (visible firming at session end) and progressive collagen remodeling that develops over 1–3 months as fibroblasts produce new collagen and elastin. The ICD integrated cryogen cooling protects the epidermis throughout. No injections, no incisions, and no required recovery time.
Before & After
XERF Lifting Results at RE:BERRY Gangnam
※ Photos are published with the patient's consent and show the same person before and after treatment. Timing and conditions are as stated; images are unretouched. Side effects such as swelling, bruising, or pain may occur after treatment. Individual results may vary.
Treatment Process
XERF Lifting — 4 Steps from Consultation to Aftercare
※ Illustrative images are AI-generated to help explain the treatment process.
XERF vs Thermage FLX — Which One at RE:BERRY Gangnam?
Both — XERF and Thermage FLX are in-house monopolar RF treatments at RE:BERRY Gangnam. XERF delivers dual-frequency (6.78MHz + 2MHz) energy reaching SMAS depth in 15-30 minutes; Thermage FLX delivers single-frequency 6.78MHz RF with a 20-year clinical record and a dedicated eye tip. Neither is universally better — your assigned physician matches the device to your anatomy; pricing on consultation.
XERF vs Thermage FLX in Gangnam — Shared Benefits and Results Timeline
- Both devices in one clinic: RE:BERRY Gangnam operates XERF and Thermage FLX in-house, so the XERF vs Thermage FLX recommendation follows your anatomy — not a single-device inventory
- XERF strength — dual-frequency architecture (6.78MHz + 2MHz) covers Shallow, Middle, and Deep layers including the SMAS in one 15-30 minute session
- Thermage FLX strength — 20+ years of published monopolar RF evidence since 2002 FDA clearance, plus a dedicated 0.25cm2 eye tip for eyelid-area tightening
- No needles, no downtime on either path — patients return to daily activities and apply makeup the same day
- Comfort engineering on both: XERF pairs ICD cryogen cooling with Wave Fit variable pulses; Thermage FLX pairs cryogen spray with multi-directional vibration
- Same-doctor continuity: one assigned physician handles mapping, device selection, treatment, and the 3-month review for every XERF vs Thermage FLX patient
- Korean-market access: XERF launched first in Korea in May 2024 before its 2025 FDA clearance — Seoul patients experience the technology in its home market
- 8-language coordination at RE:BERRY Gangnam via WhatsApp, LINE, and WeChat for patients from the US, Japan, Taiwan, Australia, and beyond
| Timeline | What to Expect |
|---|---|
| Session complete — 15-30 minutes for XERF, 45-60 minutes for Thermage FLX. Immediate tightening from collagen fiber contracture is visible on both paths. Surface warmth resolves within 1-2 hours; makeup and normal activities resume same day. | |
| Residual warmth fully resolved. Early jawline and cheek definition visible. Avoid alcohol, saunas, hot baths, and intense exercise for 7 days — the identical post-RF protocol applies whether you chose XERF or Thermage FLX. | |
| Progressive collagen remodeling underway on either device path as fibroblasts respond to the controlled thermal stimulus. Skin density and contour continue improving week over week. | |
| Peak neocollagenesis phase — optimal results assessed at 90 days with photographic comparison. Results on both devices typically persist 6 months to 1 year depending on individual aging trajectory; your physician recommends an individualized maintenance cadence. |
XERF vs Thermage FLX at RE:BERRY Gangnam — Two Valid Monopolar RF Paths
| Axis | XERF | Thermage FLX | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Energy Category | Non-invasive monopolar RF (radiofrequency) | Non-invasive monopolar RF (radiofrequency) | MFDS/FDA device registrations |
| Frequency Architecture | Dual: 6.78MHz + 2MHz simultaneously | Single: 6.78MHz with AccuREP per-pulse calibration | Manufacturer specifications 2026 |
| Depth Strategy | 3 selectable levels (Shallow/Middle/Deep) reaching the SMAS in one pass | Depth set by tip geometry; multi-pass technique builds cumulative heating | Manufacturer specifications; peer-reviewed RF literature |
| Cooling System | ICD — Integrated Cryogen Delivery throughout energy delivery | Cryogen spray before/during/after each pulse + vibration comfort | Manufacturer specifications 2026 |
| Tip System | EFFECTOR 05/10/40/60 + i05/i10 (2026), spider-pattern electrode | Total Tip 4.0cm2 (up to 900 pulses) + dedicated 0.25cm2 eye tip | Manufacturer specifications 2026 |
| Session Time (Full Face) | 15-30 minutes | 45-60 minutes | RE:BERRY clinic protocol (verified) |
| Session Configuration at RE:BERRY | 300-shot or 600-shot configuration — pricing on consultation | 600-shot session — see treatment page for details | RE:BERRY clinic protocol (verified) |
| Regulatory and Clinical History | MFDS approved 2024, FDA-cleared 2025, 2,000+ units installed globally | FDA-cleared monopolar RF lineage since 2002; FLX generation 2017; 20+ years of published data | MFDS database; FDA 510(k) records; manufacturer PR 2026 |
| Eye-Area Capability | Narrow EFFECTOR 05 tip (5x10mm) for perioral and narrow zones | Dedicated 0.25cm2 eye tip designed for eyelid-area treatment | Manufacturer specifications 2026 |
| Typically Suited Cases | Jawline, double chin, multi-depth laxity wanting a shorter session | Eye-area tightening, patients preferring the longest-documented device | RE:BERRY physician protocol (verified) |
Why This Matters
Doctor continuity directly affects treatment outcomes. According to KHIDI's 2025 Medical Tourism Survey, 41.4% of Japanese patients ranked 'same doctor throughout treatment' as their #1 priority when choosing a Korean clinic. At RE:BERRY Gangnam, the physician who maps your anatomy makes the XERF vs Thermage FLX call, performs the session, and reviews your 3-month photographs.
Korea's average outpatient consultation is 4.3 minutes — the shortest in the OECD (average 16.4 minutes). RE:BERRY's 60-90 minute consultations run 15-20x the national average, which is what makes an honest two-device comparison possible: depth requirement, eye-area needs, and session-time preference are each evaluated before any device is recommended.
Korean aesthetic procedures cost 40-70% less than comparable treatments in the US and 30-50% less than Japan, using the same FDA/MFDS-cleared device generations. Because RE:BERRY Gangnam operates both XERF and Thermage FLX in-house, patients compare two monopolar RF paths inside one Seoul consultation instead of two separate clinic visits. Source: KHIDI 2025, ASDS Annual Survey.
July 2026 Promotions
Exclusive packages for international patients. Swipe to see all offers.
XERF vs Thermage FLX Pricing at RE:BERRY Gangnam — Consultation Based
Your Physician — XERF vs Thermage FLX Selection at RE:BERRY Gangnam
Dr. Yoon-Gon Ryu
- CEO / Medical Director, RE:BERRY Clinic Gangnam
- Korean Ministry of Health and Welfare Medical License No. 131644
- Regular Member, Korean Academy of Aesthetic Medicine
- Member, Korean Society for Stem Cell Research
- Revinas KOL (Key Opinion Leader) — Weyergans
- Juvelook KOL — Glovi
- Featured in Authority Magazine (2026)
Medically reviewed by Dr. Yoon-Gon Ryu, CEO / Medical Director, RE:BERRY
Science of XERF vs Thermage FLX — Two Monopolar RF Architectures
Same Physics, Different Depth Strategies
Both XERF and Thermage FLX are monopolar radiofrequency devices: an oscillating electric field between the treatment electrode and a grounding pad produces ionic agitation and resistive heating in tissue, triggering immediate collagen fiber contracture and progressive neocollagenesis over 1-3 months. Depth of monopolar RF heating is inversely related to frequency — lower frequencies penetrate deeper. Thermage FLX operates at a single 6.78MHz, concentrating thermal effect in the dermal layers (1.5-3.0mm) and building cumulative depth through multi-pass technique and tip geometry. XERF adds a second 2MHz frequency to the same 6.78MHz base, extending controlled heating to the deep dermis and the SMAS layer at 3.0-5.0mm+ within a single pass — the architectural difference that defines the XERF vs Thermage FLX decision.
Fitzpatrick R, Geronemus R, Goldberg D, Kaminer M, Kilmer S, Ruiz-Esparza J. Multicenter study of noninvasive radiofrequency for periorbital tissue tightening. Lasers Surg Med. 2003;33(4):232-242. doi:10.1002/lsm.10225
Thermage's evidence base is the deepest in monopolar RF. The 2003 multicenter periorbital study (n=86) established measurable brow elevation and periorbital tightening with a single treatment, and a 2007 multi-specialty consensus survey covering 5,700 monopolar RF treatments documented that the refined multiple-pass, lower-energy protocol markedly improved both visible tightening rates and patient comfort scores compared with the original single-pass, high-energy technique. Histological work supports the mechanism: ultrastructural analysis of multiple-pass low-energy treatment demonstrated greater collagen fibril change than single-pass high-energy delivery, and a 2011 quantitative study reported statistically significant increases in dermal collagen types I and III at 3 and 6 months post-RF (p<0.05).
Dover JS, Zelickson B; 14-Physician Multispecialty Consensus Panel. Results of a survey of 5,700 patient monopolar radiofrequency facial skin tightening treatments. Dermatol Surg. 2007;33(8):900-907. doi:10.1111/j.1524-4725.2007.33191.x
Kist D, Burns AJ, Sanner R, Counters J, Zelickson BD. Ultrastructural evaluation of multiple pass low energy versus single pass high energy radio-frequency treatment. Lasers Surg Med. 2006;38(2):150-154. doi:10.1002/lsm.20303
XERF's contribution is depth selectivity. By delivering 6.78MHz and 2MHz simultaneously, the device addresses three tissue depth categories — Shallow, Middle, Deep — including the SMAS, the fibromuscular support layer at 4-6mm whose age-related laxity drives jowl formation and jawline blur. A 2025 Korean prospective pilot study of dual-frequency monopolar RF in East Asian patients reported facial lifting efficacy with a favorable safety profile in Fitzpatrick III-V skin, and the platform's real-time impedance feedback plus 10-level energy control compensate for tissue impedance shifts during treatment. XERF received Korean MFDS approval in January 2024, launched first in Korea in May 2024, earned FDA clearance in August 2025, and surpassed 2,000 installed units globally by mid-2026.
Choi EJ, Kim JY, Park HJ, Lee SH. Efficacy and safety of dual-frequency monopolar radiofrequency for facial lifting in East Asian patients: a prospective pilot study. J Korean Soc Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025;31(1):12-21. doi:10.30745/jksaps.2025.31.1.12
Comfort and epidermal protection are engineered differently but toward the same goal. XERF's Integrated Cryogen Delivery (ICD) cools the surface continuously during energy delivery while Wave Fit variable pulses modulate peak power; Thermage FLX applies cryogen spray before, during, and after each pulse alongside multi-directional vibration, with AccuREP measuring tissue impedance and auto-calibrating each individual pulse. Both strategies protect melanocytes and keratinocytes — a meaningful consideration in Fitzpatrick III-V East Asian skin — and published monopolar RF safety data across diverse skin types report low adverse-event rates when energy staging protocols are followed. Earlier controlled work also confirmed monopolar RF improvement of cheek and neck laxity, the zones where the XERF vs Thermage FLX selection is most often weighed.
Alster TS, Tanzi E. Improvement of neck and cheek laxity with a nonablative radiofrequency device: a lifting experience. Dermatol Surg. 2004;30(4 Pt 1):503-507. doi:10.1111/j.1524-4725.2004.30164.x
One honest limitation: as of 2026 no peer-reviewed head-to-head randomized trial directly comparing XERF and Thermage FLX has been published. Device selection at RE:BERRY Gangnam therefore rests on documented per-device evidence plus anatomical criteria — depth requirement, eye-area involvement, session-time constraints, and skin type — rather than on any claim that either platform is categorically superior. That is also why both devices remain in service side by side: the 2 architectures solve overlapping but not identical clinical problems, and the 3-month photographic review closes the loop on each individual patient's response.
el-Domyati M, el-Ammawi TS, Medhat W, Moawad O, Brennan D, Mahoney MG, Uitto J. Radiofrequency facial rejuvenation: evidence-based effect. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011;64(3):524-535. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2010.06.045
XERF vs Thermage FLX Korea FAQ — Frequently Asked Questions
Who decides between XERF and Thermage FLX at RE:BERRY Gangnam Seoul?
One assigned physician handles the entire XERF vs Thermage FLX process at RE:BERRY Gangnam — Mark-Vu mapping, device recommendation, treatment, and the 3-month photographic review. KHIDI's 2025 survey shows 41.4% of Japanese patients rank same-doctor continuity as their #1 clinic-selection criterion. The full device overview is on the XERF Lifting Gangnam Seoul Korea page.
What is the main difference between XERF and Thermage FLX monopolar RF devices?
| Feature | XERF | Thermage FLX |
|---|---|---|
| Frequency | Dual 6.78MHz + 2MHz | Single 6.78MHz |
| Depth | 3 levels incl. SMAS, one pass | Tip-set depth, multi-pass |
| Cooling | ICD integrated cryogen | Cryogen spray + vibration |
| Session | 15-30 min | 45-60 min |
| Record | MFDS 2024, FDA 2025 | FDA lineage since 2002 |
How much does XERF vs Thermage FLX treatment cost in Seoul Korea?
| Country | Monopolar RF Market Range | Source |
|---|---|---|
| South Korea (Seoul) | 40-70% less than US — RE:BERRY quote on consultation | KHIDI 2025 |
| USA | $1,500-4,000 per session | ASDS Annual Survey 2024 |
| Japan | ¥200,000-450,000 ($1,350-3,000) | clinicjapan.net 2026 |
| UK | £1,200-2,500 per session | Industry data 2026 |
| Australia | AUD $1,800-3,200 per session | Industry data 2026 |
| Taiwan | NT$45,000-90,000 per session | Industry data 2026 |
Which is better for jawline tightening in Gangnam — XERF or Thermage FLX?
Neither is universally better — the decision is anatomical. XERF's 2MHz frequency reaches the SMAS layer (4-6mm) implicated in jowl formation, in a 15-30 minute session, which is why jawline and double-chin cases are frequently mapped to XERF lifting. Thermage FLX achieves documented cheek and jawline tightening through 20+ years of multi-pass protocol evidence. Your Thermage FLX vs XERF recommendation is written into your chart with reasoning.
Can I combine XERF and Thermage FLX in one Seoul treatment plan at RE:BERRY?
Yes — in a physician-staged protocol, not the same session on the same zone. Both devices heat tissue through monopolar RF, so RE:BERRY Gangnam sequences them by zone and interval: for example, XERF for the jawline and lower face, Thermage FLX with the 0.25cm2 eye tip for the periorbital area. Many patients also add a different energy category such as Ultherapy Prime (focused ultrasound) for focal deep points. Your physician plans sequence and spacing across a 3-5 day Seoul itinerary.
Is XERF or Thermage FLX safer for East Asian skin types at RE:BERRY Gangnam?
Both carry engineered epidermal protection and both are used on Fitzpatrick III-V East Asian skin at RE:BERRY Gangnam. XERF cools continuously via Integrated Cryogen Delivery; Thermage FLX applies cryogen spray with every AccuREP-calibrated pulse. A 2025 Korean pilot study of dual-frequency monopolar RF reported a favorable safety profile in East Asian patients, and Korean physicians collectively treat far more energy-device cases per year than US counterparts — Korea received 2,011,822 foreign medical visitors in 2025 (MOHW), 62.9% for dermatology. Fitzpatrick typing precedes every session.
Why choose a boutique clinic over a franchise for XERF vs Thermage FLX in Seoul?
| Factor | Boutique (RE:BERRY) | Franchise Chain |
|---|---|---|
| Consultation | 60-90 min, two-device comparison | 15-30 min typical |
| Device inventory | XERF + Thermage FLX in-house | Often single RF device |
| Doctor | Same doctor, all visits | Variable by booking |
| Walk-in | Appointment only | Walk-in available |
How long does a XERF session take compared to a Thermage FLX session in Gangnam?
15-30 minutes for XERF versus 45-60 minutes for Thermage FLX full-face at RE:BERRY Gangnam. XERF covers multiple depths in one pass through dual frequencies, while Thermage FLX builds cumulative heating through multi-pass technique with up to 900 AccuREP-calibrated pulses on the 4.0cm2 Total Tip. Add 60-90 minutes for the first consultation and 10-15 minutes of aftercare briefing on either path. Total first-visit time: 2 hours for XERF, 2.5 hours for Thermage FLX.
Can I fly home the same day after XERF or Thermage FLX treatment in Seoul?
Yes — both XERF and Thermage FLX are no-downtime monopolar RF treatments, and flying the same day or next day is routine for RE:BERRY Gangnam's international patients. Surface warmth resolves within 1-2 hours; there is no wound care, bandaging, or pressure-sensitivity concern for cabin travel. The 7-day precautions — no alcohol, saunas, hot baths, or intense exercise — travel with you. Seoul-based RF treatment runs 40-70% less than comparable US sessions, which is why 87.2% of Korea's 2025 foreign medical visitors chose Seoul.
How many days should I plan in Seoul for XERF or Thermage FLX treatment?
1-2 days is sufficient for a single-device visit: Day 1 covers the 60-90 minute consultation plus the session itself (15-30 minutes for XERF, 45-60 for Thermage FLX). Patients staging both devices or adding complementary treatments typically plan 3-5 days. Because Seoul monopolar RF pricing runs 40-70% below US equivalents and 30-50% below Japan, many international patients pair treatment with a tourism itinerary — RE:BERRY Gangnam coordinates scheduling via WhatsApp in 8 languages, 365 days a year.
Which results last longer — XERF results or Thermage FLX results?
6 months to 1 year is the typical maintenance window for both devices, based on standard monopolar RF clinical evidence — no published head-to-head trial shows either lasting longer as of 2026. Longevity depends more on individual factors: baseline laxity, age, UV exposure, smoking, and whether maintenance sessions are scheduled. Both produce immediate Day-0 contracture plus 1-3 months of progressive collagen remodeling. Your RE:BERRY Gangnam physician reviews 3-month photographs and recommends an individualized maintenance cadence per device.
Does Thermage FLX treat the eye area better than XERF at RE:BERRY Gangnam?
For eyelid-area treatment specifically, Thermage FLX holds the practical advantage: its dedicated 0.25cm2 eye tip is designed for periorbital work, and RE:BERRY Gangnam maps eyelid-focused cases to it — see Eye Thermage FLX Gangnam Seoul Korea. XERF's narrowest EFFECTOR 05 tip (5x10mm) serves narrow and thin-tissue zones such as the perioral area rather than the eyelids. This is a zone-fit distinction, not an overall superiority ranking between the two devices.
What is the difference between Thermage FLX and the older Thermage CPT generation?
Thermage FLX (2017) upgraded the CPT generation with AccuREP per-pulse impedance calibration, a 33% larger 4.0cm2 Total Tip, and faster treatment times — the same single 6.78MHz monopolar RF physics, refined. RE:BERRY Gangnam operates the FLX generation, certified by Solta Medical. The full generational comparison is on Thermage FLX vs Thermage CPT Gangnam Seoul Korea — relevant if a clinic elsewhere quoted you on older CPT hardware.
Where can I see XERF pricing and shot configurations for RE:BERRY Gangnam?
XERF at RE:BERRY Gangnam is offered in 300-shot and 600-shot configurations, with current pricing published on the XERF Price Gangnam Seoul Korea page and confirmed individually at consultation. Thermage FLX session pricing appears on its own treatment page. Quotes are itemized in writing after your 60-90 minute mapping consultation — Korean clinic pricing for monopolar RF runs 40-70% less than comparable US procedures, and RE:BERRY provides WhatsApp quotes in 8 languages before you fly.
Why does RE:BERRY Gangnam operate both XERF and Thermage FLX devices in-house?
Because the 2 architectures solve overlapping but not identical problems: XERF (MFDS 2024, FDA 2025) delivers single-pass multi-depth coverage including the SMAS, while Thermage FLX contributes a 20-year evidence base and eyelid-specific capability. RE:BERRY Gangnam holds Solta Medical's Thermage FLX certification alongside KHIDI registration M-2025-01-08-09203, and adopted XERF following its Korean launch in May 2024. Operating both removes single-device bias from the recommendation — the physician matches architecture to anatomy, documented in every chart.
How do I book a XERF vs Thermage FLX consultation at RE:BERRY Gangnam from overseas?
WhatsApp is the fastest route: RE:BERRY Gangnam's 8-language team handles scheduling, device questions, and travel logistics before you arrive. The clinic operates 365 days a year, 10:00 AM-8:00 PM KST, 2 minutes from Gangnam Station Exit 10 (Line 2), under KHIDI International Patient Attraction registration M-2025-01-08-09203. Seoul received 87.2% of Korea's 2,011,822 foreign medical visitors in 2025, with monopolar RF priced 40-70% below US equivalents. Clinic-selection guidance: Choosing a Thermage FLX Clinic in Gangnam.
Only Authentic, Brand-Certified Equipment
Every device at RE:BERRY is MFDS-certified and manufacturer-verified. We never use counterfeit or grey-market equipment.
Compare XERF vs Thermage FLX In Person at RE:BERRY Gangnam, Seoul
Two monopolar RF architectures, one clinic, one assigned physician. Bring your concerns — jawline, cheeks, double chin, or eye area — and leave with a documented recommendation matched to your anatomy, not to a single-device inventory. XERF and Thermage FLX are both operated in-house at RE:BERRY Gangnam, 2 minutes from Gangnam Station Exit 10, open 365 days. WhatsApp consultation is free and available in 8 languages.
Why Tens of Thousands of Foreign Patients Are Choosing This Gangnam Clinic — Business Wire, 2026-04-13
Numbers That Tell Our Story
Real procedures performed.
Brand-Authenticated Equipment & Training
Our doctors are certified by Korea's top dermatological societies
Latest from Our Instagram
Real treatments, patient reactions, and behind-the-scenes from RE:BERRY.
Tap any video for sound & fullscreen
What our patients say
Real verified reviews from our Google Business Profile
i had a good time having the Juvelook treatment!
It was my first time in Korea, all the Doctor & team are bery helpful. Dr. Ian & cheong a lee(jenny) are really helpful.
I understand more about my skin.
The clinic is calm, welcoming.
there are many activities i didn’t expect to find in a beauty clinic; phot...
When you walk into the clinic, it genuinely feels like a luxury experience.
The staff was so kind and attentive the whole time 🤍.
The consultation felt very personalized, and they recommended treatments that truly matched what my skin needed instead of just recommending anything.
Honestly, I hope to come back next year
Great place! Came coz of an ad online and wanted to check out the place. They were able to fit me and my husband in right away as walk-ins. They took us to a sink to wash our faces, then took photos for skin analysis and before photos. Then they proceeded to give us a consultation ( c/o Jin Wooyoung) and advice on what...
So happy to found the beauty clinic in Korea that very inclusive and Muslim friendly. They have a prayer space for muslim and they prepare a female doctor for me. The clinic is so comfortable with aesthetic design make me feel relaxed. The doctor and the staff are very professional and helpful so all of the procedure r...
I had an excellent experience at Reberry Gangnam. The staff were professional, welcoming, and took the time to explain each treatment thoroughly. I had microneedling and other skin treatments, and the entire process was comfortable and well-organized. The clinic was modern, clean, and made me feel at ease from start to...
Book Your Personalized Consultation
Share your details and our multilingual team will contact you within 24 hours through your preferred messenger.
- ✓ Free online skin consultation with a doctor
- ✓ Personalized treatment plan & pricing
- ✓ Airport pickup coordination available
- ✓ 8-language support (EN/JP/CN/TW/TH/ES/MN/AR)
- ✓ Response within 24 hours via your preferred messenger
Science XERF vs Thermage FLX — peer-reviewed monopolar RF references
Monopolar radiofrequency skin tightening carries more than two decades of peer-reviewed evidence. The Thermage lineage anchors the older end of that record: the 2003 FDA-era multicenter periorbital study, the 2007 multi-specialty survey of 5,700 treatments that validated the multiple-pass low-energy protocol, and quantitative histology confirming statistically significant dermal collagen type I and III increases at 3 and 6 months. XERF extends the same monopolar physics with a dual-frequency (6.78MHz + 2MHz) architecture, with device-specific literature emerging from its 2024 Korean MFDS registration through 2025 FDA clearance — including a 2025 Korean prospective pilot in East Asian skin types directly relevant to RE:BERRY Gangnam's patient population. No head-to-head randomized trial between the two platforms has been published as of 2026, which is why the references below inform device-by-device selection criteria rather than a superiority ranking.
- Fitzpatrick R, Geronemus R, Goldberg D, Kaminer M, Kilmer S, Ruiz-Esparza J. Multicenter study of noninvasive radiofrequency for periorbital tissue tightening. Lasers Surg Med. 2003;33(4):232-242. doi:10.1002/lsm.10225
- Dover JS, Zelickson B; 14-Physician Multispecialty Consensus Panel. Results of a survey of 5,700 patient monopolar radiofrequency facial skin tightening treatments. Dermatol Surg. 2007;33(8):900-907. doi:10.1111/j.1524-4725.2007.33191.x
- Kist D, Burns AJ, Sanner R, Counters J, Zelickson BD. Ultrastructural evaluation of multiple pass low energy versus single pass high energy radio-frequency treatment. Lasers Surg Med. 2006;38(2):150-154. doi:10.1002/lsm.20303
- Alster TS, Tanzi E. Improvement of neck and cheek laxity with a nonablative radiofrequency device: a lifting experience. Dermatol Surg. 2004;30(4 Pt 1):503-507. doi:10.1111/j.1524-4725.2004.30164.x
- el-Domyati M, el-Ammawi TS, Medhat W, Moawad O, Brennan D, Mahoney MG, Uitto J. Radiofrequency facial rejuvenation: evidence-based effect. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011;64(3):524-535. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2010.06.045
- Choi EJ, Kim JY, Park HJ, Lee SH. Efficacy and safety of dual-frequency monopolar radiofrequency for facial lifting in East Asian patients: a prospective pilot study. J Korean Soc Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025;31(1):12-21. doi:10.30745/jksaps.2025.31.1.12
These references support the RE:BERRY Gangnam two-device protocol: Mark-Vu zone mapping and Fitzpatrick typing before any recommendation, architecture-to-anatomy device selection between XERF and Thermage FLX with written reasoning, cooling-system verification throughout delivery on either platform, and photographic follow-up at 3 months under the same licensed physician. Where the published evidence is device-specific it is applied device-specifically; where it is generic to monopolar RF it informs both treatment paths equally.
How to Find RE:BERRY Gangnam
2 minutes from Gangnam Station Exit 10. B1–B2, KI Tower — the building with the all-black entrance you can't miss.
RE:BERRY Clinic Gangnam
B1–B2, KI Tower, 69-gil 8, Gangnam-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul
서울시 서초구 강남대로69길 8, 지하1·2층 (KI타워)
Also available at: Myeongdong · Incheon Airport